# Gemma 2 27B vs Palm 2

> Gemma 2 27B and Palm 2 score almost the same on the Noometry Index (29.4 vs 30.0), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemma-2-27b-vs-palm-2
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 10

## Summary

- They share 10 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 2 27B scores higher in 5 categories and Palm 2 in 2 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Palm 2 leads 30.8 to 10.7.
- Gemma 2 27B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Gemma 2 27B | Palm 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | Google |
| Noometry Index | 29.4 | 30.0 |
| Rank | 312 | 298 |
| Context | 8K | — |
| Input $/M | $0.65 | — |
| Output $/M | $0.65 | — |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Gemma 2 27B: 34.1 (#246)
- Palm 2: 29.0 (#311)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 27B | Palm 2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1211 | 994 |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 42.8% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | 36% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 52.5% | — |

## Reasoning

- Gemma 2 27B: 15.3 (#315)
- Palm 2: 19.1 (#271)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 27B | Palm 2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1198 | 1005 |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 28.1% | — |
| DTBench | 48% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 47.9% | — |
| LMCA | 7.1% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 122.08 | — |
| LiveBench | 38.2% | — |

## Math

- Gemma 2 27B: 10.7 (#311)
- Palm 2: 30.8 (#231)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 27B | Palm 2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1212 | 1049 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 1.4% | — |
| LiveBench Math | 26.5% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 27.9% | — |

## Knowledge

- Gemma 2 27B: 19.0 (#280)
- Palm 2: —

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 27B | Palm 2 |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 36.5% | — |
| Confabulations | 27.1% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1172 | — |
| MMLU | 75.7% | — |

## Multilingual

- Gemma 2 27B: 38.6 (#226)
- Palm 2: 20.9 (#295)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 27B | Palm 2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1217 | 916 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1221 | 887 |
| LMArena French | 1247 | — |
| LMArena German | 1209 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1175 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1174 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1234 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1228 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Gemma 2 27B: 60.5 (#249)
- Palm 2: 51.0 (#296)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 27B | Palm 2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1206 | 1010 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 58.1% | — |

## Long Context

- Gemma 2 27B: 37.3 (#218)
- Palm 2: 30.8 (#285)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 27B | Palm 2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1231 | 1010 |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemma 2 27B: 44.2 (#225)
- Palm 2: 25.6 (#304)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 27B | Palm 2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1231 | 1027 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1241 | 991 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1224 | 994 |
| LiveBench Language | 32.6% | — |

## FAQ

### Is Gemma 2 27B better than Palm 2?

Gemma 2 27B and Palm 2 score almost the same on the Noometry Index (29.4 vs 30.0), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

### Is Gemma 2 27B or Palm 2 better for coding?

Gemma 2 27B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 34.1 versus 29.0 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Gemma 2 27B and Palm 2 share?

10 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 2 27B has 34 scored results on Noometry and Palm 2 has 10.