# Gemma 2 27B vs Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct

> Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 32.2 to 29.2 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemma-2-27b-vs-olmo-2-0325-32b-instruct
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 11

## Summary

- They share 11 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 2 27B scores higher in 3 categories and Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct in 5 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct leads 24.8 to 10.0.

## Snapshot

| | Gemma 2 27B | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) |
| Noometry Index | 29.2 | 32.2 |
| Rank | 302 | 248 |
| Context | 8K | — |
| Input $/M | $0.65 | — |
| Output $/M | $0.65 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Gemma 2 27B: 33.5 (#243)
- Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 34.6 (#222)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 27B | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1211 | 1210 |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 42.8% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | 36% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 52.5% | — |

## Reasoning

- Gemma 2 27B: 14.8 (#313)
- Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 22.6 (#174)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 27B | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1199 | 1208 |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 28.1% | — |
| DTBench | 48% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 47.9% | — |
| LMCA | 7.1% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 122.06 | — |
| LiveBench | 38.2% | — |

## Math

- Gemma 2 27B: 10.0 (#306)
- Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 24.8 (#255)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 27B | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1212 | 1208 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 1.4% | — |
| Omni-MATH | — | 16.1% |
| LiveBench Math | 26.5% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 27.9% | — |

## Knowledge

- Gemma 2 27B: 18.9 (#275)
- Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 19.2 (#274)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 27B | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 36.5% | — |
| MMLU-Pro | — | 41.4% |
| Confabulations | 27.1% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | — | 28.7% |
| LMArena Expert | 1172 | — |
| MMLU | 75.7% | — |

## Multilingual

- Gemma 2 27B: 38.8 (#221)
- Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 35.0 (#243)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 27B | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1217 | 1160 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1221 | 1192 |
| LMArena Russian | 1234 | 1187 |
| LMArena French | 1246 | — |
| LMArena German | 1209 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1175 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1174 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1228 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Gemma 2 27B: 60.7 (#244)
- Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 61.8 (#238)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 27B | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1206 | 1186 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 58.1% | — |
| IFEval | — | 78% |

## Long Context

- Gemma 2 27B: 37.3 (#213)
- Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 36.2 (#229)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 27B | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1231 | 1194 |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemma 2 27B: 44.4 (#220)
- Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 42.3 (#231)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 27B | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1231 | 1218 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1241 | 1199 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1224 | 1221 |
| WildBench | — | 73.4% |
| LiveBench Language | 32.6% | — |

## FAQ

### Is Gemma 2 27B better than Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct?

Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 32.2 to 29.2 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Gemma 2 27B or Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct better for coding?

Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct scores higher on coding benchmarks: 34.6 versus 33.5 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Gemma 2 27B and Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct share?

11 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 2 27B has 34 scored results on Noometry and Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct has 16.