# Gemma 2 27B vs Molmo 2 8b

> Molmo 2 8b is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.7 to 29.2 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemma-2-27b-vs-molmo-2-8b
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 4

## Summary

- They share 4 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 2 27B scores higher in 0 categories and Molmo 2 8b in 4 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Molmo 2 8b leads 24.5 to 14.8.

## Snapshot

| | Gemma 2 27B | Molmo 2 8b |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) |
| Noometry Index | 29.2 | 38.7 |
| Rank | 302 | 170 |
| Context | 8K | — |
| Input $/M | $0.65 | — |
| Output $/M | $0.65 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Gemma 2 27B: 33.5 (#243)
- Molmo 2 8b: —

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 27B | Molmo 2 8b |
|---|---|---|
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 42.8% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | 36% | — |
| LMArena Coding | 1211 | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 52.5% | — |

## Reasoning

- Gemma 2 27B: 14.8 (#313)
- Molmo 2 8b: 24.5 (#146)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 27B | Molmo 2 8b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1199 | 1288 |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 28.1% | — |
| DTBench | 48% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 47.9% | — |
| LMCA | 7.1% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 122.06 | — |
| LiveBench | 38.2% | — |

## Math

- Gemma 2 27B: 10.0 (#306)
- Molmo 2 8b: —

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 27B | Molmo 2 8b |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 1.4% | — |
| LiveBench Math | 26.5% | — |
| LMArena Math | 1212 | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 27.9% | — |

## Knowledge

- Gemma 2 27B: 18.9 (#275)
- Molmo 2 8b: —

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 27B | Molmo 2 8b |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 36.5% | — |
| Confabulations | 27.1% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1172 | — |
| MMLU | 75.7% | — |

## Multimodal

- Gemma 2 27B: —
- Molmo 2 8b: 29.5 (#106)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 27B | Molmo 2 8b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1081 |

## Multilingual

- Gemma 2 27B: 38.8 (#221)
- Molmo 2 8b: 42.8 (#186)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 27B | Molmo 2 8b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1217 | 1275 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1221 | — |
| LMArena French | 1246 | — |
| LMArena German | 1209 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1175 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1174 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1234 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1228 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Gemma 2 27B: 60.7 (#244)
- Molmo 2 8b: 67.2 (#196)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 27B | Molmo 2 8b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1206 | 1270 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 58.1% | — |

## Long Context

- Gemma 2 27B: 37.3 (#213)
- Molmo 2 8b: —

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 27B | Molmo 2 8b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1231 | — |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemma 2 27B: 44.4 (#220)
- Molmo 2 8b: 49.5 (#187)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 27B | Molmo 2 8b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1231 | 1288 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1241 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1224 | — |
| LiveBench Language | 32.6% | — |

## FAQ

### Is Gemma 2 27B better than Molmo 2 8b?

Molmo 2 8b is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.7 to 29.2 on the Noometry Index.

### How many benchmarks do Gemma 2 27B and Molmo 2 8b share?

4 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 2 27B has 34 scored results on Noometry and Molmo 2 8b has 5.