# Gemma 2 27B vs Mistral Small 3.2

> Mistral Small 3.2 is the stronger model overall, scoring 30.8 to 29.2 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemma-2-27b-vs-mistral-small-3-2
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 3

## Summary

- They share 3 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 2 27B scores higher in 0 categories and Mistral Small 3.2 in 4 categories; 3 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Mistral Small 3.2 leads 24.9 to 10.0.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025: 1.4% for Gemma 2 27B and 30.3% for Mistral Small 3.2.
- Mistral Small 3.2 is cheaper at $0.0938 / $0.25 per million input/output tokens, against $0.65 / $0.65 for Gemma 2 27B.
- Mistral Small 3.2 accepts more context: 256K tokens versus 8K.

## Snapshot

| | Gemma 2 27B | Mistral Small 3.2 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | Mistral AI |
| Noometry Index | 29.2 | 30.8 |
| Rank | 302 | 271 |
| Context | 8K | 256K |
| Input $/M | $0.65 | $0.0938 |
| Output $/M | $0.65 | $0.25 |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Gemma 2 27B: 33.5 (#243)
- Mistral Small 3.2: —

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 27B | Mistral Small 3.2 |
|---|---|---|
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 42.8% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | 36% | — |
| LMArena Coding | 1211 | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 52.5% | — |

## Reasoning

- Gemma 2 27B: 14.8 (#313)
- Mistral Small 3.2: 17.5 (#282)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 27B | Mistral Small 3.2 |
|---|---|---|
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 122.06 | 131.73 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 40.4% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 1% |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 28.1% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1199 | — |
| DTBench | 48% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 47.9% | — |
| LMCA | 7.1% | — |
| LiveBench | 38.2% | — |

## Math

- Gemma 2 27B: 10.0 (#306)
- Mistral Small 3.2: 24.9 (#251)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 27B | Mistral Small 3.2 |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 1.4% | 30.3% |
| LiveBench Math | 26.5% | — |
| LMArena Math | 1212 | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 27.9% | — |

## Knowledge

- Gemma 2 27B: 18.9 (#275)
- Mistral Small 3.2: 26.8 (#249)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 27B | Mistral Small 3.2 |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 36.5% | 49.1% |
| Confabulations | 27.1% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1172 | — |
| MMLU | 75.7% | — |

## Multilingual

- Gemma 2 27B: 38.8 (#221)
- Mistral Small 3.2: —

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 27B | Mistral Small 3.2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1217 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1221 | — |
| LMArena French | 1246 | — |
| LMArena German | 1209 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1175 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1174 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1234 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1228 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Gemma 2 27B: 60.7 (#244)
- Mistral Small 3.2: —

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 27B | Mistral Small 3.2 |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 58.1% | — |
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1206 | — |

## Long Context

- Gemma 2 27B: 37.3 (#213)
- Mistral Small 3.2: —

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 27B | Mistral Small 3.2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1231 | — |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemma 2 27B: 44.4 (#220)
- Mistral Small 3.2: 45.1 (#219)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 27B | Mistral Small 3.2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1231 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1241 | — |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 1255 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1224 | — |
| LiveBench Language | 32.6% | — |

## FAQ

### Is Gemma 2 27B better than Mistral Small 3.2?

Mistral Small 3.2 is the stronger model overall, scoring 30.8 to 29.2 on the Noometry Index.

### Which is cheaper, Gemma 2 27B or Mistral Small 3.2?

Mistral Small 3.2 is cheaper. It lists at $0.0938 per million input tokens and $0.25 per million output tokens; Gemma 2 27B lists at $0.65 and $0.65.

### Which has the bigger context window?

Mistral Small 3.2 does, with 256K tokens against 8K.

### How many benchmarks do Gemma 2 27B and Mistral Small 3.2 share?

3 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 2 27B has 34 scored results on Noometry and Mistral Small 3.2 has 6.