# Gemma 2 27B vs Mistral Medium 3.5

> Mistral Medium 3.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.2 to 29.4 on the Noometry Index. Gemma 2 27B costs 4.6× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Mistral Medium 3.5's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemma-2-27b-vs-mistral-medium-3-5
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 17

## Summary

- They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 2 27B scores higher in 0 categories and Mistral Medium 3.5 in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Mistral Medium 3.5 leads 39.1 to 10.7.
- Gemma 2 27B is cheaper at $0.65 / $0.65 per million input/output tokens, against $1.50 / $7.50 for Mistral Medium 3.5.
- Mistral Medium 3.5 accepts more context: 262K tokens versus 8K.

## Snapshot

| | Gemma 2 27B | Mistral Medium 3.5 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | Mistral AI |
| Noometry Index | 29.4 | 40.2 |
| Rank | 312 | 152 |
| Context | 8K | 262K |
| Input $/M | $0.65 | $1.50 |
| Output $/M | $0.65 | $7.50 |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Gemma 2 27B: 34.1 (#246)
- Mistral Medium 3.5: 36.0 (#213)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 27B | Mistral Medium 3.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1211 | 1461 |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1264 |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 42.8% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | 36% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 52.5% | — |

## Reasoning

- Gemma 2 27B: 15.3 (#315)
- Mistral Medium 3.5: 17.3 (#295)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 27B | Mistral Medium 3.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1198 | 1436 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 122.08 | 141.35 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 41.4% |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 12.9% |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 28.1% | — |
| DTBench | 48% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 47.9% | — |
| LMCA | 7.1% | — |
| LiveBench | 38.2% | — |

## Math

- Gemma 2 27B: 10.7 (#311)
- Mistral Medium 3.5: 39.1 (#113)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 27B | Mistral Medium 3.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1212 | 1431 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 1.4% | — |
| LiveBench Math | 26.5% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 27.9% | — |

## Knowledge

- Gemma 2 27B: 19.0 (#280)
- Mistral Medium 3.5: 40.0 (#126)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 27B | Mistral Medium 3.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1172 | 1432 |
| GPQA Diamond | 36.5% | — |
| Confabulations | 27.1% | — |
| MMLU | 75.7% | — |

## Multimodal

- Gemma 2 27B: —
- Mistral Medium 3.5: 38.3 (#65)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 27B | Mistral Medium 3.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1223 |

## Multilingual

- Gemma 2 27B: 38.6 (#226)
- Mistral Medium 3.5: 51.9 (#100)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 27B | Mistral Medium 3.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1217 | 1404 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1221 | 1442 |
| LMArena French | 1247 | 1448 |
| LMArena German | 1209 | 1451 |
| LMArena Korean | 1174 | 1385 |
| LMArena Russian | 1234 | 1395 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1228 | 1409 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1175 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Gemma 2 27B: 60.5 (#249)
- Mistral Medium 3.5: 74.6 (#90)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 27B | Mistral Medium 3.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1206 | 1415 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 58.1% | — |

## Long Context

- Gemma 2 27B: 37.3 (#218)
- Mistral Medium 3.5: 43.2 (#103)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 27B | Mistral Medium 3.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1231 | 1415 |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemma 2 27B: 44.2 (#225)
- Mistral Medium 3.5: 58.5 (#117)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 27B | Mistral Medium 3.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1231 | 1421 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1241 | 1374 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1224 | 1423 |
| EQ-Bench 4 | — | 993 |
| LiveBench Language | 32.6% | — |

## FAQ

### Is Gemma 2 27B better than Mistral Medium 3.5?

Mistral Medium 3.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.2 to 29.4 on the Noometry Index. Gemma 2 27B costs 4.6× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Mistral Medium 3.5's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

### Which is cheaper, Gemma 2 27B or Mistral Medium 3.5?

Gemma 2 27B is cheaper. It lists at $0.65 per million input tokens and $0.65 per million output tokens; Mistral Medium 3.5 lists at $1.50 and $7.50.

### Is Gemma 2 27B or Mistral Medium 3.5 better for coding?

Mistral Medium 3.5 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 36.0 versus 34.1 in the Noometry coding category.

### Which has the bigger context window?

Mistral Medium 3.5 does, with 262K tokens against 8K.

### How many benchmarks do Gemma 2 27B and Mistral Medium 3.5 share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 2 27B has 34 scored results on Noometry and Mistral Medium 3.5 has 22.