# Gemma 2 27B vs Llama 3-70B

> Gemma 2 27B and Llama 3-70B score almost the same on the Noometry Index (29.2 vs 28.5), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemma-2-27b-vs-llama-3-70b
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 25

## Summary

- They share 25 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 2 27B scores higher in 3 categories and Llama 3-70B in 5 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in multilingual, where Gemma 2 27B leads 38.8 to 33.8.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is DTBench: 48% for Gemma 2 27B and 54.2% for Llama 3-70B.

## Snapshot

| | Gemma 2 27B | Llama 3-70B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | Meta |
| Noometry Index | 29.2 | 28.5 |
| Rank | 302 | 317 |
| Context | 8K | — |
| Input $/M | $0.65 | — |
| Output $/M | $0.65 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Gemma 2 27B: 33.5 (#243)
- Llama 3-70B: 35.3 (#215)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 27B | Llama 3-70B |
|---|---|---|
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 42.8% | 43.6% |
| LMArena Coding | 1211 | 1206 |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 52.5% | 54.5% |
| LiveBench Coding | 36% | — |
| HumanEval+ | — | 72% |
| MBPP+ | — | 69% |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Gemma 2 27B: —
- Llama 3-70B: 20.9 (#132)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 27B | Llama 3-70B |
|---|---|---|
| Cybench | — | 5% |

## Reasoning

- Gemma 2 27B: 14.8 (#313)
- Llama 3-70B: 17.4 (#284)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 27B | Llama 3-70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1199 | 1195 |
| DTBench | 48% | 54.2% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 122.06 | 122.91 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 35.1% |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 28.1% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 47.9% | — |
| LMCA | 7.1% | — |
| ForecastBench | — | 57.1 |
| LiveBench | 38.2% | — |
| WinoGrande | — | 83.5% |

## Math

- Gemma 2 27B: 10.0 (#306)
- Llama 3-70B: 12.0 (#299)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 27B | Llama 3-70B |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 1.4% | 4.3% |
| LMArena Math | 1212 | 1218 |
| MATH Level 5 | 27.9% | 22.6% |
| LiveBench Math | 26.5% | — |

## Knowledge

- Gemma 2 27B: 18.9 (#275)
- Llama 3-70B: 20.8 (#272)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 27B | Llama 3-70B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 36.5% | 40.6% |
| LMArena Expert | 1172 | 1149 |
| MMLU | 75.7% | 79.3% |
| Confabulations | 27.1% | — |

## Multilingual

- Gemma 2 27B: 38.8 (#221)
- Llama 3-70B: 33.8 (#246)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 27B | Llama 3-70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1217 | 1142 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1221 | 1114 |
| LMArena French | 1246 | 1231 |
| LMArena German | 1209 | 1169 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1175 | 1017 |
| LMArena Korean | 1174 | 1017 |
| LMArena Russian | 1234 | 1159 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1228 | 1241 |

## Instruction Following

- Gemma 2 27B: 60.7 (#244)
- Llama 3-70B: 62.8 (#233)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 27B | Llama 3-70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1206 | 1194 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 58.1% | — |

## Long Context

- Gemma 2 27B: 37.3 (#213)
- Llama 3-70B: 35.6 (#235)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 27B | Llama 3-70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1231 | 1174 |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemma 2 27B: 44.4 (#220)
- Llama 3-70B: 43.0 (#225)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 27B | Llama 3-70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1231 | 1221 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1241 | 1210 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1224 | 1223 |
| LiveBench Language | 32.6% | — |

## FAQ

### Is Gemma 2 27B better than Llama 3-70B?

Gemma 2 27B and Llama 3-70B score almost the same on the Noometry Index (29.2 vs 28.5), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

### Is Gemma 2 27B or Llama 3-70B better for coding?

Llama 3-70B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 35.3 versus 33.5 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Gemma 2 27B and Llama 3-70B share?

25 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 2 27B has 34 scored results on Noometry and Llama 3-70B has 31.