# Gemma 2 27B vs Llama 3.2 3B

> Gemma 2 27B and Llama 3.2 3B score almost the same on the Noometry Index (29.2 vs 28.4), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemma-2-27b-vs-llama-3-2-3b
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 15

## Summary

- They share 15 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 2 27B scores higher in 5 categories and Llama 3.2 3B in 3 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Llama 3.2 3B leads 29.9 to 10.0.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is BigCodeBench Complete: 52.5% for Gemma 2 27B and 28.3% for Llama 3.2 3B.
- Llama 3.2 3B is cheaper at $0.05 / $0.33 per million input/output tokens, against $0.65 / $0.65 for Gemma 2 27B.
- Llama 3.2 3B accepts more context: 131K tokens versus 8K.

## Snapshot

| | Gemma 2 27B | Llama 3.2 3B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | Meta |
| Noometry Index | 29.2 | 28.4 |
| Rank | 302 | 318 |
| Context | 8K | 131K |
| Input $/M | $0.65 | $0.05 |
| Output $/M | $0.65 | $0.33 |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Gemma 2 27B: 33.5 (#243)
- Llama 3.2 3B: 27.1 (#314)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 27B | Llama 3.2 3B |
|---|---|---|
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 42.8% | 23.4% |
| LMArena Coding | 1211 | 1098 |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 52.5% | 28.3% |
| LiveBench Coding | 36% | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Gemma 2 27B: —
- Llama 3.2 3B: 19.9 (#135)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 27B | Llama 3.2 3B |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | — | 21.9% |
| BALROG | — | 10.1% |

## Reasoning

- Gemma 2 27B: 14.8 (#313)
- Llama 3.2 3B: 20.1 (#225)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 27B | Llama 3.2 3B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1199 | 1095 |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 28.1% | — |
| DTBench | 48% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 47.9% | — |
| LMCA | 7.1% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 122.06 | — |
| LiveBench | 38.2% | — |

## Math

- Gemma 2 27B: 10.0 (#306)
- Llama 3.2 3B: 29.9 (#213)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 27B | Llama 3.2 3B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1212 | 1126 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 1.4% | — |
| LiveBench Math | 26.5% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 27.9% | — |

## Knowledge

- Gemma 2 27B: 18.9 (#275)
- Llama 3.2 3B: 29.1 (#232)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 27B | Llama 3.2 3B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1172 | 1090 |
| GPQA Diamond | 36.5% | — |
| Confabulations | 27.1% | — |
| MMLU | 75.7% | — |

## Multilingual

- Gemma 2 27B: 38.8 (#221)
- Llama 3.2 3B: 26.4 (#276)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 27B | Llama 3.2 3B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1217 | 1019 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1221 | 1017 |
| LMArena German | 1209 | 1056 |
| LMArena Russian | 1234 | 949 |
| LMArena French | 1246 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1175 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1174 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1228 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Gemma 2 27B: 60.7 (#244)
- Llama 3.2 3B: 56.3 (#270)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 27B | Llama 3.2 3B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1206 | 1089 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 58.1% | — |

## Long Context

- Gemma 2 27B: 37.3 (#213)
- Llama 3.2 3B: 33.4 (#256)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 27B | Llama 3.2 3B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1231 | 1101 |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemma 2 27B: 44.4 (#220)
- Llama 3.2 3B: 24.9 (#302)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 27B | Llama 3.2 3B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1231 | 1110 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1241 | 1094 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1224 | 1105 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 595 |
| LiveBench Language | 32.6% | — |

## FAQ

### Is Gemma 2 27B better than Llama 3.2 3B?

Gemma 2 27B and Llama 3.2 3B score almost the same on the Noometry Index (29.2 vs 28.4), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

### Which is cheaper, Gemma 2 27B or Llama 3.2 3B?

Llama 3.2 3B is cheaper. It lists at $0.05 per million input tokens and $0.33 per million output tokens; Gemma 2 27B lists at $0.65 and $0.65.

### Is Gemma 2 27B or Llama 3.2 3B better for coding?

Gemma 2 27B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 33.5 versus 27.1 in the Noometry coding category.

### Which has the bigger context window?

Llama 3.2 3B does, with 131K tokens against 8K.

### How many benchmarks do Gemma 2 27B and Llama 3.2 3B share?

15 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 2 27B has 34 scored results on Noometry and Llama 3.2 3B has 18.