# Gemma 2 27B vs Llama 2-13B

> Gemma 2 27B and Llama 2-13B score almost the same on the Noometry Index (29.2 vs 29.1), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemma-2-27b-vs-llama-2-13b
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 20

## Summary

- They share 20 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 2 27B scores higher in 6 categories and Llama 2-13B in 2 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Llama 2-13B leads 28.7 to 10.0.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is DTBench: 48% for Gemma 2 27B and 42.2% for Llama 2-13B.

## Snapshot

| | Gemma 2 27B | Llama 2-13B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | Meta |
| Noometry Index | 29.2 | 29.1 |
| Rank | 302 | 304 |
| Context | 8K | — |
| Input $/M | $0.65 | — |
| Output $/M | $0.65 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Gemma 2 27B: 33.5 (#243)
- Llama 2-13B: 30.4 (#287)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 27B | Llama 2-13B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1211 | 1062 |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 42.8% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | 36% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 52.5% | — |

## Reasoning

- Gemma 2 27B: 14.8 (#313)
- Llama 2-13B: 12.3 (#333)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 27B | Llama 2-13B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1199 | 1051 |
| DTBench | 48% | 42.2% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 122.06 | 105.8 |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 0% |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 28.1% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 47.9% | — |
| LMCA | 7.1% | — |
| BIG-Bench Hard | — | 58.2% |
| HellaSwag | — | 80.7% |
| LAMBADA | — | 76.5% |
| LiveBench | 38.2% | — |
| PIQA | — | 80.8% |
| WinoGrande | — | 72.8% |

## Math

- Gemma 2 27B: 10.0 (#306)
- Llama 2-13B: 28.7 (#226)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 27B | Llama 2-13B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1212 | 1065 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 1.4% | — |
| LiveBench Math | 26.5% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 27.9% | — |
| GSM8K | — | 36.9% |

## Knowledge

- Gemma 2 27B: 18.9 (#275)
- Llama 2-13B: 27.5 (#244)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 27B | Llama 2-13B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1172 | 1030 |
| MMLU | 75.7% | 55.6% |
| GPQA Diamond | 36.5% | — |
| Confabulations | 27.1% | — |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | — | 60.3% |
| BoolQ | — | 82.4% |
| OpenBookQA | — | 57% |
| TriviaQA | — | 79.6% |

## Multimodal

- Gemma 2 27B: —
- Llama 2-13B: —

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 27B | Llama 2-13B |
|---|---|---|
| ScienceQA | — | 55.8% |

## Multilingual

- Gemma 2 27B: 38.8 (#221)
- Llama 2-13B: 26.7 (#274)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 27B | Llama 2-13B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1217 | 1024 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1221 | 1001 |
| LMArena French | 1246 | 1043 |
| LMArena German | 1209 | 1009 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1175 | 894 |
| LMArena Korean | 1174 | 953 |
| LMArena Russian | 1234 | 1055 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1228 | 1086 |

## Instruction Following

- Gemma 2 27B: 60.7 (#244)
- Llama 2-13B: 53.5 (#282)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 27B | Llama 2-13B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1206 | 1046 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 58.1% | — |

## Long Context

- Gemma 2 27B: 37.3 (#213)
- Llama 2-13B: 32.3 (#264)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 27B | Llama 2-13B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1231 | 1064 |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemma 2 27B: 44.4 (#220)
- Llama 2-13B: 30.0 (#284)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 27B | Llama 2-13B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1231 | 1085 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1241 | 1047 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1224 | 1050 |
| LiveBench Language | 32.6% | — |

## FAQ

### Is Gemma 2 27B better than Llama 2-13B?

Gemma 2 27B and Llama 2-13B score almost the same on the Noometry Index (29.2 vs 29.1), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

### Is Gemma 2 27B or Llama 2-13B better for coding?

Gemma 2 27B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 33.5 versus 30.4 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Gemma 2 27B and Llama 2-13B share?

20 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 2 27B has 34 scored results on Noometry and Llama 2-13B has 32.