# Gemma 2 27B vs Llama 13b

> Gemma 2 27B is the stronger model overall, scoring 29.4 to 24.4 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemma-2-27b-vs-llama-13b
- Last updated: 2026-10-12
- Shared benchmarks: 10

## Summary

- They share 10 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 2 27B scores higher in 5 categories and Llama 13b in 1 category; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Gemma 2 27B leads 44.2 to 13.8.

## Snapshot

| | Gemma 2 27B | Llama 13b |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | Meta |
| Noometry Index | 29.4 | 24.4 |
| Rank | 312 | 348 |
| Context | 8K | — |
| Input $/M | $0.65 | — |
| Output $/M | $0.65 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Gemma 2 27B: 34.1 (#246)
- Llama 13b: 21.4 (#337)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 27B | Llama 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1211 | 683 |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 42.8% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | 36% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 52.5% | — |

## Reasoning

- Gemma 2 27B: 15.3 (#315)
- Llama 13b: 14.0 (#329)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 27B | Llama 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1198 | 728 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 122.08 | 100.58 |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 28.1% | — |
| DTBench | 48% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 47.9% | — |
| LMCA | 7.1% | — |
| BIG-Bench Hard | — | 37.9% |
| HellaSwag | — | 79.2% |
| LAMBADA | — | 75.2% |
| LiveBench | 38.2% | — |
| PIQA | — | 80.1% |
| WinoGrande | — | 73% |

## Math

- Gemma 2 27B: 10.7 (#311)
- Llama 13b: 26.7 (#256)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 27B | Llama 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1212 | 838 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 1.4% | — |
| LiveBench Math | 26.5% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 27.9% | — |
| GSM8K | — | 20.6% |

## Knowledge

- Gemma 2 27B: 19.0 (#280)
- Llama 13b: —

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 27B | Llama 13b |
|---|---|---|
| MMLU | 75.7% | 47.7% |
| GPQA Diamond | 36.5% | — |
| Confabulations | 27.1% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1172 | — |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | — | 52.7% |
| BoolQ | — | 78.7% |
| OpenBookQA | — | 56.4% |
| TriviaQA | — | 77.9% |

## Multimodal

- Gemma 2 27B: —
- Llama 13b: —

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 27B | Llama 13b |
|---|---|---|
| ScienceQA | — | 43.3% |

## Multilingual

- Gemma 2 27B: 38.6 (#226)
- Llama 13b: 16.6 (#297)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 27B | Llama 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1217 | 819 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1221 | — |
| LMArena French | 1247 | — |
| LMArena German | 1209 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1175 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1174 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1234 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1228 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Gemma 2 27B: 60.5 (#249)
- Llama 13b: 36.7 (#305)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 27B | Llama 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1206 | 781 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 58.1% | — |

## Long Context

- Gemma 2 27B: 37.3 (#218)
- Llama 13b: —

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 27B | Llama 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1231 | — |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemma 2 27B: 44.2 (#225)
- Llama 13b: 13.8 (#312)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 27B | Llama 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1231 | 834 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1241 | 794 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1224 | 753 |
| LiveBench Language | 32.6% | — |

## FAQ

### Is Gemma 2 27B better than Llama 13b?

Gemma 2 27B is the stronger model overall, scoring 29.4 to 24.4 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Gemma 2 27B or Llama 13b better for coding?

Gemma 2 27B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 34.1 versus 21.4 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Gemma 2 27B and Llama 13b share?

10 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 2 27B has 34 scored results on Noometry and Llama 13b has 21.