# Gemma 2 27B vs Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent

> Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent is the stronger model overall, scoring 46.2 to 29.4 on the Noometry Index. Gemma 2 27B costs 2.4× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemma-2-27b-vs-grok-4-20-multi-agent
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 17

## Summary

- They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 2 27B scores higher in 0 categories and Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent leads 39.4 to 10.7.
- Gemma 2 27B is cheaper at $0.65 / $0.65 per million input/output tokens, against $1.25 / $2.50 for Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent.
- Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent accepts more context: 1M tokens versus 8K.
- Gemma 2 27B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Gemma 2 27B | Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | xAI |
| Noometry Index | 29.4 | 46.2 |
| Rank | 312 | 65 |
| Context | 8K | 1M |
| Input $/M | $0.65 | $1.25 |
| Output $/M | $0.65 | $2.50 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Gemma 2 27B: 34.1 (#246)
- Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 43.0 (#92)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 27B | Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1211 | 1457 |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 42.8% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | 36% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 52.5% | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Gemma 2 27B: —
- Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: —

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 27B | Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Search | — | 1204 |

## Reasoning

- Gemma 2 27B: 15.3 (#315)
- Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 43.9 (#48)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 27B | Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1198 | 1448 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 89.6% |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 28.1% | — |
| DTBench | 48% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 47.9% | — |
| LMCA | 7.1% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 122.08 | — |
| LiveBench | 38.2% | — |

## Math

- Gemma 2 27B: 10.7 (#311)
- Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 39.4 (#104)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 27B | Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1212 | 1442 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 1.4% | — |
| LiveBench Math | 26.5% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 27.9% | — |

## Knowledge

- Gemma 2 27B: 19.0 (#280)
- Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 40.4 (#119)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 27B | Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1172 | 1445 |
| GPQA Diamond | 36.5% | — |
| Confabulations | 27.1% | — |
| MMLU | 75.7% | — |

## Multimodal

- Gemma 2 27B: —
- Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 40.5 (#48)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 27B | Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1259 |

## Multilingual

- Gemma 2 27B: 38.6 (#226)
- Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 54.4 (#43)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 27B | Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1217 | 1440 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1221 | 1475 |
| LMArena French | 1247 | 1466 |
| LMArena German | 1209 | 1456 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1175 | 1405 |
| LMArena Korean | 1174 | 1416 |
| LMArena Russian | 1234 | 1457 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1228 | 1447 |

## Instruction Following

- Gemma 2 27B: 60.5 (#249)
- Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 74.8 (#84)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 27B | Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1206 | 1420 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 58.1% | — |

## Long Context

- Gemma 2 27B: 37.3 (#218)
- Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 43.7 (#88)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 27B | Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1231 | 1431 |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemma 2 27B: 44.2 (#225)
- Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 64.0 (#59)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 27B | Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1231 | 1450 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1241 | 1436 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1224 | 1452 |
| LiveBench Language | 32.6% | — |

## FAQ

### Is Gemma 2 27B better than Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent?

Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent is the stronger model overall, scoring 46.2 to 29.4 on the Noometry Index. Gemma 2 27B costs 2.4× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

### Which is cheaper, Gemma 2 27B or Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent?

Gemma 2 27B is cheaper. It lists at $0.65 per million input tokens and $0.65 per million output tokens; Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent lists at $1.25 and $2.50.

### Is Gemma 2 27B or Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent better for coding?

Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.0 versus 34.1 in the Noometry coding category.

### Which has the bigger context window?

Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent does, with 1M tokens against 8K.

### How many benchmarks do Gemma 2 27B and Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 2 27B has 34 scored results on Noometry and Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent has 20.