# Gemma 2 27B vs Granite 4.2 30b

> Granite 4.2 30b is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.4 to 29.2 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemma-2-27b-vs-granite-4-2-30b
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 11

## Summary

- They share 11 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 2 27B scores higher in 0 categories and Granite 4.2 30b in 7 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Granite 4.2 30b leads 38.5 to 18.9.

## Snapshot

| | Gemma 2 27B | Granite 4.2 30b |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | IBM |
| Noometry Index | 29.2 | 41.4 |
| Rank | 302 | 126 |
| Context | 8K | — |
| Input $/M | $0.65 | — |
| Output $/M | $0.65 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Gemma 2 27B: 33.5 (#243)
- Granite 4.2 30b: 40.4 (#127)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 27B | Granite 4.2 30b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1211 | 1394 |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 42.8% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | 36% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 52.5% | — |

## Reasoning

- Gemma 2 27B: 14.8 (#313)
- Granite 4.2 30b: 26.7 (#114)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 27B | Granite 4.2 30b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1199 | 1375 |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 28.1% | — |
| DTBench | 48% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 47.9% | — |
| LMCA | 7.1% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 122.06 | — |
| LiveBench | 38.2% | — |

## Math

- Gemma 2 27B: 10.0 (#306)
- Granite 4.2 30b: —

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 27B | Granite 4.2 30b |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 1.4% | — |
| LiveBench Math | 26.5% | — |
| LMArena Math | 1212 | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 27.9% | — |

## Knowledge

- Gemma 2 27B: 18.9 (#275)
- Granite 4.2 30b: 38.5 (#134)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 27B | Granite 4.2 30b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1172 | 1405 |
| GPQA Diamond | 36.5% | — |
| Confabulations | 27.1% | — |
| MMLU | 75.7% | — |

## Multilingual

- Gemma 2 27B: 38.8 (#221)
- Granite 4.2 30b: 47.4 (#146)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 27B | Granite 4.2 30b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1217 | 1340 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1221 | 1415 |
| LMArena Russian | 1234 | 1342 |
| LMArena French | 1246 | — |
| LMArena German | 1209 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1175 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1174 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1228 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Gemma 2 27B: 60.7 (#244)
- Granite 4.2 30b: 71.3 (#150)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 27B | Granite 4.2 30b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1206 | 1346 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 58.1% | — |

## Long Context

- Gemma 2 27B: 37.3 (#213)
- Granite 4.2 30b: 41.4 (#135)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 27B | Granite 4.2 30b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1231 | 1359 |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemma 2 27B: 44.4 (#220)
- Granite 4.2 30b: 54.3 (#147)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 27B | Granite 4.2 30b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1231 | 1363 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1241 | 1294 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1224 | 1340 |
| LiveBench Language | 32.6% | — |

## FAQ

### Is Gemma 2 27B better than Granite 4.2 30b?

Granite 4.2 30b is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.4 to 29.2 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Gemma 2 27B or Granite 4.2 30b better for coding?

Granite 4.2 30b scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.4 versus 33.5 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Gemma 2 27B and Granite 4.2 30b share?

11 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 2 27B has 34 scored results on Noometry and Granite 4.2 30b has 11.