# Gemma 2 27B vs Gemma 3n E4b IT

> Gemma 3n E4b IT is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.3 to 29.4 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemma-2-27b-vs-gemma-3n-e4b-it
- Last updated: 2026-10-11
- Shared benchmarks: 17

## Summary

- They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 2 27B scores higher in 0 categories and Gemma 3n E4b IT in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Gemma 3n E4b IT leads 35.1 to 10.7.

## Snapshot

| | Gemma 2 27B | Gemma 3n E4b IT |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | Google |
| Noometry Index | 29.4 | 37.3 |
| Rank | 312 | 206 |
| Context | 8K | — |
| Input $/M | $0.65 | — |
| Output $/M | $0.65 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Gemma 2 27B: 34.1 (#246)
- Gemma 3n E4b IT: 37.0 (#198)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 27B | Gemma 3n E4b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1211 | 1268 |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 42.8% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | 36% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 52.5% | — |

## Reasoning

- Gemma 2 27B: 15.3 (#315)
- Gemma 3n E4b IT: 19.9 (#247)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 27B | Gemma 3n E4b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1198 | 1284 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 31.5% |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 28.1% | — |
| DTBench | 48% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 47.9% | — |
| LMCA | 7.1% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 122.08 | — |
| LiveBench | 38.2% | — |

## Math

- Gemma 2 27B: 10.7 (#311)
- Gemma 3n E4b IT: 35.1 (#188)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 27B | Gemma 3n E4b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1212 | 1251 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 1.4% | — |
| LiveBench Math | 26.5% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 27.9% | — |

## Knowledge

- Gemma 2 27B: 19.0 (#280)
- Gemma 3n E4b IT: 34.2 (#198)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 27B | Gemma 3n E4b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1172 | 1246 |
| GPQA Diamond | 36.5% | — |
| Confabulations | 27.1% | — |
| MMLU | 75.7% | — |

## Multilingual

- Gemma 2 27B: 38.6 (#226)
- Gemma 3n E4b IT: 43.4 (#183)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 27B | Gemma 3n E4b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1217 | 1285 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1221 | 1309 |
| LMArena French | 1247 | 1330 |
| LMArena German | 1209 | 1311 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1175 | 1272 |
| LMArena Korean | 1174 | 1259 |
| LMArena Russian | 1234 | 1288 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1228 | 1305 |

## Instruction Following

- Gemma 2 27B: 60.5 (#249)
- Gemma 3n E4b IT: 66.1 (#210)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 27B | Gemma 3n E4b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1206 | 1255 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 58.1% | — |

## Long Context

- Gemma 2 27B: 37.3 (#218)
- Gemma 3n E4b IT: 38.7 (#191)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 27B | Gemma 3n E4b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1231 | 1276 |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemma 2 27B: 44.2 (#225)
- Gemma 3n E4b IT: 50.1 (#186)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 27B | Gemma 3n E4b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1231 | 1306 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1241 | 1287 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1224 | 1276 |
| LiveBench Language | 32.6% | — |

## FAQ

### Is Gemma 2 27B better than Gemma 3n E4b IT?

Gemma 3n E4b IT is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.3 to 29.4 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Gemma 2 27B or Gemma 3n E4b IT better for coding?

Gemma 3n E4b IT scores higher on coding benchmarks: 37.0 versus 34.1 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Gemma 2 27B and Gemma 3n E4b IT share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 2 27B has 34 scored results on Noometry and Gemma 3n E4b IT has 18.