# Gemma 1.1 7b IT vs Qwen-14B

> Gemma 1.1 7b IT and Qwen-14B score almost the same on the Noometry Index (31.3 vs 31.4), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemma-1-1-7b-it-vs-qwen-14b
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 10

## Summary

- They share 10 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 1.1 7b IT scores higher in 7 categories and Qwen-14B in 0 categories; 2 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.

## Snapshot

| | Gemma 1.1 7b IT | Qwen-14B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 31.3 | 31.4 |
| Rank | 277 | 275 |
| Context | — | — |
| Input $/M | — | — |
| Output $/M | — | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Gemma 1.1 7b IT: 31.5 (#284)
- Qwen-14B: 31.2 (#288)

| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 7b IT | Qwen-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1084 | 1071 |
| HumanEval+ | 35.4% | — |
| MBPP+ | 45% | — |

## Reasoning

- Gemma 1.1 7b IT: 20.5 (#238)
- Qwen-14B: 19.6 (#257)

| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 7b IT | Qwen-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1071 | 1027 |
| BIG-Bench Hard | — | 55% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 113.03 |
| LAMBADA | — | 71.1% |
| PIQA | — | 79.9% |

## Math

- Gemma 1.1 7b IT: 32.0 (#220)
- Qwen-14B: 31.2 (#227)

| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 7b IT | Qwen-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1107 | 1068 |
| GSM8K | — | 61.3% |

## Knowledge

- Gemma 1.1 7b IT: 28.3 (#247)
- Qwen-14B: —

| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 7b IT | Qwen-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1039 | — |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | — | 84.4% |
| BoolQ | — | 86.2% |
| MMLU | — | 66.3% |

## Multilingual

- Gemma 1.1 7b IT: 28.1 (#273)
- Qwen-14B: 27.5 (#275)

| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 7b IT | Qwen-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1052 | 1041 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1061 | 1077 |
| LMArena French | 1065 | — |
| LMArena German | 1054 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 971 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 988 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1046 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1049 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Gemma 1.1 7b IT: 54.0 (#283)
- Qwen-14B: 52.4 (#289)

| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 7b IT | Qwen-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1057 | 1031 |

## Long Context

- Gemma 1.1 7b IT: 32.1 (#272)
- Qwen-14B: 31.3 (#280)

| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 7b IT | Qwen-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1056 | 1028 |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemma 1.1 7b IT: 30.4 (#288)
- Qwen-14B: 27.6 (#299)

| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 7b IT | Qwen-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1094 | 1051 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1060 | 1028 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1040 | 1022 |

## FAQ

### Is Gemma 1.1 7b IT better than Qwen-14B?

Gemma 1.1 7b IT and Qwen-14B score almost the same on the Noometry Index (31.3 vs 31.4), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

### Is Gemma 1.1 7b IT or Qwen-14B better for coding?

They score almost the same on coding (31.5 vs 31.2); test both on your own repository before choosing.

### How many benchmarks do Gemma 1.1 7b IT and Qwen-14B share?

10 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 1.1 7b IT has 19 scored results on Noometry and Qwen-14B has 18.