# Gemma 1.1 7b IT vs MiniMax-M2

> MiniMax-M2 is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.4 to 31.3 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemma-1-1-7b-it-vs-minimax-m2
- Last updated: 2026-10-12
- Shared benchmarks: 15

## Summary

- They share 15 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 1.1 7b IT scores higher in 1 category and MiniMax-M2 in 7 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where MiniMax-M2 leads 53.0 to 30.4.

## Snapshot

| | Gemma 1.1 7b IT | MiniMax-M2 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | MiniMax |
| Noometry Index | 31.3 | 37.4 |
| Rank | 277 | 204 |
| Context | — | 205K |
| Input $/M | — | $0.30 |
| Output $/M | — | $1.20 |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Gemma 1.1 7b IT: 31.5 (#284)
- MiniMax-M2: 39.3 (#159)

| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 7b IT | MiniMax-M2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1084 | 1370 |
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | — | 61% |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1297 |
| HumanEval+ | 35.4% | — |
| MBPP+ | 45% | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Gemma 1.1 7b IT: —
- MiniMax-M2: 25.1 (#109)

| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 7b IT | MiniMax-M2 |
|---|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench | — | 30% |
| Vending-Bench 2 | — | 160.6 |

## Reasoning

- Gemma 1.1 7b IT: 20.5 (#238)
- MiniMax-M2: 19.4 (#258)

| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 7b IT | MiniMax-M2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1071 | 1357 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 57.8% |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 14.8% |

## Math

- Gemma 1.1 7b IT: 32.0 (#220)
- MiniMax-M2: 37.3 (#160)

| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 7b IT | MiniMax-M2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1107 | 1352 |

## Knowledge

- Gemma 1.1 7b IT: 28.3 (#247)
- MiniMax-M2: 37.0 (#163)

| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 7b IT | MiniMax-M2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1039 | 1337 |

## Multilingual

- Gemma 1.1 7b IT: 28.1 (#273)
- MiniMax-M2: 45.3 (#171)

| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 7b IT | MiniMax-M2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1052 | 1313 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1061 | 1366 |
| LMArena French | 1065 | 1335 |
| LMArena German | 1054 | 1355 |
| LMArena Russian | 1046 | 1331 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1049 | 1326 |
| LMArena Japanese | 971 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 988 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Gemma 1.1 7b IT: 54.0 (#283)
- MiniMax-M2: 70.2 (#166)

| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 7b IT | MiniMax-M2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1057 | 1328 |

## Long Context

- Gemma 1.1 7b IT: 32.1 (#272)
- MiniMax-M2: 40.5 (#153)

| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 7b IT | MiniMax-M2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1056 | 1331 |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemma 1.1 7b IT: 30.4 (#288)
- MiniMax-M2: 53.0 (#162)

| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 7b IT | MiniMax-M2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1094 | 1340 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1060 | 1286 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1040 | 1361 |

## FAQ

### Is Gemma 1.1 7b IT better than MiniMax-M2?

MiniMax-M2 is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.4 to 31.3 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Gemma 1.1 7b IT or MiniMax-M2 better for coding?

MiniMax-M2 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 39.3 versus 31.5 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Gemma 1.1 7b IT and MiniMax-M2 share?

15 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 1.1 7b IT has 19 scored results on Noometry and MiniMax-M2 has 21.