# Gemma 1.1 7b IT vs MiMo-V2.5-Pro

> MiMo-V2.5-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 44.8 to 30.7 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemma-1-1-7b-it-vs-mimo-v2-5-pro
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 17

## Summary

- They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 1.1 7b IT scores higher in 0 categories and MiMo-V2.5-Pro in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads 65.5 to 30.6.

## Snapshot

| | Gemma 1.1 7b IT | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | Xiaomi |
| Noometry Index | 30.7 | 44.8 |
| Rank | 275 | 70 |
| Context | — | 1.05M |
| Input $/M | — | $0.43 |
| Output $/M | — | $0.87 |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Gemma 1.1 7b IT: 31.0 (#279)
- MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 47.0 (#58)

| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 7b IT | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1084 | 1502 |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1477 |
| SciCode | — | 50.2% |
| ALE-Bench | — | 899.8 |
| HumanEval+ | 35.4% | — |
| MBPP+ | 45% | — |

## Reasoning

- Gemma 1.1 7b IT: 19.6 (#235)
- MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 25.9 (#124)

| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 7b IT | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1071 | 1487 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 34.4% |
| CritPt | — | 4% |
| DTBench | — | 84.5% |
| LMCA | — | 29.5% |

## Math

- Gemma 1.1 7b IT: 29.5 (#217)
- MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 38.6 (#84)

| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 7b IT | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1107 | 1480 |
| ProofBench | — | 22% |

## Knowledge

- Gemma 1.1 7b IT: 27.8 (#242)
- MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 41.5 (#100)

| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 7b IT | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1039 | 1501 |

## Multilingual

- Gemma 1.1 7b IT: 28.3 (#268)
- MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 55.3 (#33)

| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 7b IT | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1052 | 1449 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1060 | 1507 |
| LMArena French | 1064 | 1489 |
| LMArena German | 1054 | 1455 |
| LMArena Japanese | 971 | 1418 |
| LMArena Korean | 988 | 1436 |
| LMArena Russian | 1046 | 1450 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1049 | 1470 |

## Instruction Following

- Gemma 1.1 7b IT: 54.3 (#278)
- MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 77.6 (#21)

| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 7b IT | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1057 | 1477 |

## Long Context

- Gemma 1.1 7b IT: 32.0 (#267)
- MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 45.4 (#38)

| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 7b IT | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1056 | 1482 |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemma 1.1 7b IT: 30.6 (#283)
- MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 65.5 (#47)

| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 7b IT | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1094 | 1465 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1059 | 1440 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1040 | 1477 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 1493 |
| EQ-Bench 4 | — | 1208 |

## FAQ

### Is Gemma 1.1 7b IT better than MiMo-V2.5-Pro?

MiMo-V2.5-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 44.8 to 30.7 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Gemma 1.1 7b IT or MiMo-V2.5-Pro better for coding?

MiMo-V2.5-Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 47.0 versus 31.0 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Gemma 1.1 7b IT and MiMo-V2.5-Pro share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 1.1 7b IT has 19 scored results on Noometry and MiMo-V2.5-Pro has 27.