# Gemma 1.1 7b IT vs Llama 2-7B

> Gemma 1.1 7b IT is the stronger model overall, scoring 30.7 to 28.6 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemma-1-1-7b-it-vs-llama-2-7b
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 15

## Summary

- They share 15 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 1.1 7b IT scores higher in 8 categories and Llama 2-7B in 0 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Gemma 1.1 7b IT leads 19.6 to 15.1.

## Snapshot

| | Gemma 1.1 7b IT | Llama 2-7B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | Meta |
| Noometry Index | 30.7 | 28.6 |
| Rank | 275 | 315 |
| Context | — | — |
| Input $/M | — | — |
| Output $/M | — | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Gemma 1.1 7b IT: 31.0 (#279)
- Llama 2-7B: 28.7 (#302)

| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 7b IT | Llama 2-7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1084 | 1002 |
| HumanEval+ | 35.4% | — |
| MBPP+ | 45% | — |

## Reasoning

- Gemma 1.1 7b IT: 19.6 (#235)
- Llama 2-7B: 15.1 (#309)

| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 7b IT | Llama 2-7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1071 | 1009 |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 0% |
| BIG-Bench Hard | — | 39.2% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 98.54 |
| HellaSwag | — | 77.2% |
| LAMBADA | — | 73.3% |
| PIQA | — | 78.8% |
| WinoGrande | — | 69.2% |

## Math

- Gemma 1.1 7b IT: 29.5 (#217)
- Llama 2-7B: 28.2 (#231)

| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 7b IT | Llama 2-7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1107 | 1042 |
| GSM8K | — | 16.7% |

## Knowledge

- Gemma 1.1 7b IT: 27.8 (#242)
- Llama 2-7B: 27.7 (#243)

| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 7b IT | Llama 2-7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1039 | 1036 |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | — | 45.9% |
| BoolQ | — | 77.9% |
| MMLU | — | 45.8% |
| OpenBookQA | — | 58.6% |
| TriviaQA | — | 73.7% |

## Multimodal

- Gemma 1.1 7b IT: —
- Llama 2-7B: —

| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 7b IT | Llama 2-7B |
|---|---|---|
| ScienceQA | — | 43.1% |

## Multilingual

- Gemma 1.1 7b IT: 28.3 (#268)
- Llama 2-7B: 23.9 (#288)

| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 7b IT | Llama 2-7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1052 | 973 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1060 | 973 |
| LMArena French | 1064 | 969 |
| LMArena German | 1054 | 978 |
| LMArena Russian | 1046 | 995 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1049 | 1007 |
| LMArena Japanese | 971 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 988 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Gemma 1.1 7b IT: 54.3 (#278)
- Llama 2-7B: 51.0 (#293)

| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 7b IT | Llama 2-7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1057 | 1006 |

## Long Context

- Gemma 1.1 7b IT: 32.0 (#267)
- Llama 2-7B: 30.4 (#282)

| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 7b IT | Llama 2-7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1056 | 999 |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemma 1.1 7b IT: 30.6 (#283)
- Llama 2-7B: 28.1 (#293)

| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 7b IT | Llama 2-7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1094 | 1053 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1059 | 1033 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1040 | 1029 |

## FAQ

### Is Gemma 1.1 7b IT better than Llama 2-7B?

Gemma 1.1 7b IT is the stronger model overall, scoring 30.7 to 28.6 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Gemma 1.1 7b IT or Llama 2-7B better for coding?

Gemma 1.1 7b IT scores higher on coding benchmarks: 31.0 versus 28.7 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Gemma 1.1 7b IT and Llama 2-7B share?

15 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 1.1 7b IT has 19 scored results on Noometry and Llama 2-7B has 29.