# Gemma 1.1 7b IT vs Llama 2-13B

> Gemma 1.1 7b IT is the stronger model overall, scoring 31.3 to 29.6 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemma-1-1-7b-it-vs-llama-2-13b
- Last updated: 2026-10-12
- Shared benchmarks: 17

## Summary

- They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 1.1 7b IT scores higher in 7 categories and Llama 2-13B in 1 category; 2 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Gemma 1.1 7b IT leads 20.5 to 12.8.

## Snapshot

| | Gemma 1.1 7b IT | Llama 2-13B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | Meta |
| Noometry Index | 31.3 | 29.6 |
| Rank | 277 | 309 |
| Context | — | — |
| Input $/M | — | — |
| Output $/M | — | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Gemma 1.1 7b IT: 31.5 (#284)
- Llama 2-13B: 30.9 (#291)

| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 7b IT | Llama 2-13B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1084 | 1062 |
| HumanEval+ | 35.4% | — |
| MBPP+ | 45% | — |

## Reasoning

- Gemma 1.1 7b IT: 20.5 (#238)
- Llama 2-13B: 12.8 (#337)

| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 7b IT | Llama 2-13B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1071 | 1051 |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 0% |
| DTBench | — | 42.2% |
| BIG-Bench Hard | — | 58.2% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 106.17 |
| HellaSwag | — | 80.7% |
| LAMBADA | — | 76.5% |
| PIQA | — | 80.8% |
| WinoGrande | — | 72.8% |

## Math

- Gemma 1.1 7b IT: 32.0 (#220)
- Llama 2-13B: 31.1 (#229)

| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 7b IT | Llama 2-13B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1107 | 1065 |
| GSM8K | — | 36.9% |

## Knowledge

- Gemma 1.1 7b IT: 28.3 (#247)
- Llama 2-13B: 28.1 (#249)

| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 7b IT | Llama 2-13B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1039 | 1030 |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | — | 60.3% |
| BoolQ | — | 82.4% |
| MMLU | — | 55.6% |
| OpenBookQA | — | 57% |
| TriviaQA | — | 79.6% |

## Multimodal

- Gemma 1.1 7b IT: —
- Llama 2-13B: —

| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 7b IT | Llama 2-13B |
|---|---|---|
| ScienceQA | — | 55.8% |

## Multilingual

- Gemma 1.1 7b IT: 28.1 (#273)
- Llama 2-13B: 26.5 (#279)

| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 7b IT | Llama 2-13B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1052 | 1024 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1061 | 1001 |
| LMArena French | 1065 | 1044 |
| LMArena German | 1054 | 1009 |
| LMArena Japanese | 971 | 894 |
| LMArena Korean | 988 | 953 |
| LMArena Russian | 1046 | 1055 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1049 | 1087 |

## Instruction Following

- Gemma 1.1 7b IT: 54.0 (#283)
- Llama 2-13B: 53.3 (#287)

| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 7b IT | Llama 2-13B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1057 | 1045 |

## Long Context

- Gemma 1.1 7b IT: 32.1 (#272)
- Llama 2-13B: 32.3 (#269)

| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 7b IT | Llama 2-13B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1056 | 1064 |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemma 1.1 7b IT: 30.4 (#288)
- Llama 2-13B: 29.8 (#289)

| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 7b IT | Llama 2-13B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1094 | 1084 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1060 | 1047 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1040 | 1050 |

## FAQ

### Is Gemma 1.1 7b IT better than Llama 2-13B?

Gemma 1.1 7b IT is the stronger model overall, scoring 31.3 to 29.6 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Gemma 1.1 7b IT or Llama 2-13B better for coding?

They score almost the same on coding (31.5 vs 30.9); test both on your own repository before choosing.

### How many benchmarks do Gemma 1.1 7b IT and Llama 2-13B share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 1.1 7b IT has 19 scored results on Noometry and Llama 2-13B has 32.