# Gemma 1.1 7b IT vs Granite 3.1 2b Instruct

> Granite 3.1 2b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 33.2 to 31.3 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemma-1-1-7b-it-vs-granite-3-1-2b-instruct
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 12

## Summary

- They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 1.1 7b IT scores higher in 0 categories and Granite 3.1 2b Instruct in 8 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in instruction following, where Granite 3.1 2b Instruct leads 57.7 to 54.0.

## Snapshot

| | Gemma 1.1 7b IT | Granite 3.1 2b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | IBM |
| Noometry Index | 31.3 | 33.2 |
| Rank | 277 | 247 |
| Context | — | — |
| Input $/M | — | — |
| Output $/M | — | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Gemma 1.1 7b IT: 31.5 (#284)
- Granite 3.1 2b Instruct: 33.4 (#257)

| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 7b IT | Granite 3.1 2b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1084 | 1149 |
| HumanEval+ | 35.4% | — |
| MBPP+ | 45% | — |

## Reasoning

- Gemma 1.1 7b IT: 20.5 (#238)
- Granite 3.1 2b Instruct: 22.0 (#209)

| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 7b IT | Granite 3.1 2b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1071 | 1138 |

## Math

- Gemma 1.1 7b IT: 32.0 (#220)
- Granite 3.1 2b Instruct: 33.1 (#206)

| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 7b IT | Granite 3.1 2b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1107 | 1159 |

## Knowledge

- Gemma 1.1 7b IT: 28.3 (#247)
- Granite 3.1 2b Instruct: 30.8 (#224)

| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 7b IT | Granite 3.1 2b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1039 | 1131 |

## Multilingual

- Gemma 1.1 7b IT: 28.1 (#273)
- Granite 3.1 2b Instruct: 29.1 (#269)

| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 7b IT | Granite 3.1 2b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1052 | 1068 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1061 | 1139 |
| LMArena Russian | 1046 | 1063 |
| LMArena French | 1065 | — |
| LMArena German | 1054 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 971 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 988 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1049 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Gemma 1.1 7b IT: 54.0 (#283)
- Granite 3.1 2b Instruct: 57.7 (#264)

| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 7b IT | Granite 3.1 2b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1057 | 1116 |

## Long Context

- Gemma 1.1 7b IT: 32.1 (#272)
- Granite 3.1 2b Instruct: 35.0 (#244)

| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 7b IT | Granite 3.1 2b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1056 | 1155 |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemma 1.1 7b IT: 30.4 (#288)
- Granite 3.1 2b Instruct: 34.1 (#274)

| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 7b IT | Granite 3.1 2b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1094 | 1127 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1060 | 1116 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1040 | 1099 |

## FAQ

### Is Gemma 1.1 7b IT better than Granite 3.1 2b Instruct?

Granite 3.1 2b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 33.2 to 31.3 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Gemma 1.1 7b IT or Granite 3.1 2b Instruct better for coding?

Granite 3.1 2b Instruct scores higher on coding benchmarks: 33.4 versus 31.5 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Gemma 1.1 7b IT and Granite 3.1 2b Instruct share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 1.1 7b IT has 19 scored results on Noometry and Granite 3.1 2b Instruct has 12.