# Gemma 1.1 2b IT vs Wizardlm 13b

> Wizardlm 13b is the stronger model overall, scoring 30.8 to 28.8 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemma-1-1-2b-it-vs-wizardlm-13b
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 10

## Summary

- They share 10 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 1.1 2b IT scores higher in 1 category and Wizardlm 13b in 6 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Wizardlm 13b leads 30.7 to 25.3.

## Snapshot

| | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | Microsoft |
| Noometry Index | 28.8 | 30.8 |
| Rank | 313 | 272 |
| Context | — | — |
| Input $/M | — | — |
| Output $/M | — | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 29.6 (#294)
- Wizardlm 13b: 29.6 (#293)

| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1034 | 1035 |
| HumanEval+ | 17.7% | — |
| MBPP+ | 23.3% | — |

## Reasoning

- Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 18.2 (#268)
- Wizardlm 13b: 18.5 (#265)

| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1005 | 1018 |

## Math

- Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 28.3 (#230)
- Wizardlm 13b: 27.8 (#235)

| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1047 | 1017 |

## Knowledge

- Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 26.0 (#255)
- Wizardlm 13b: —

| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 970 | — |

## Multilingual

- Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 24.7 (#284)
- Wizardlm 13b: 27.3 (#272)

| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 988 | 1034 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1011 | 1023 |
| LMArena German | 944 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 899 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 990 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 50.1 (#294)
- Wizardlm 13b: 53.7 (#280)

| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 992 | 1049 |

## Long Context

- Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 30.5 (#281)
- Wizardlm 13b: 32.0 (#268)

| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1003 | 1054 |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 25.3 (#301)
- Wizardlm 13b: 30.7 (#282)

| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1022 | 1077 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 998 | 1090 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 958 | 1047 |

## FAQ

### Is Gemma 1.1 2b IT better than Wizardlm 13b?

Wizardlm 13b is the stronger model overall, scoring 30.8 to 28.8 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Gemma 1.1 2b IT or Wizardlm 13b better for coding?

They score almost the same on coding (29.6 vs 29.6); test both on your own repository before choosing.

### How many benchmarks do Gemma 1.1 2b IT and Wizardlm 13b share?

10 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 1.1 2b IT has 16 scored results on Noometry and Wizardlm 13b has 10.