# Gemma 1.1 2b IT vs Step 3.5 Flash

> Step 3.5 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.7 to 28.8 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemma-1-1-2b-it-vs-step-3-5-flash
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 14

## Summary

- They share 14 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 1.1 2b IT scores higher in 0 categories and Step 3.5 Flash in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Step 3.5 Flash leads 59.0 to 25.3.

## Snapshot

| | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Step 3.5 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | StepFun |
| Noometry Index | 28.8 | 41.7 |
| Rank | 313 | 116 |
| Context | — | 256K |
| Input $/M | — | $0.10 |
| Output $/M | — | $0.30 |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 29.6 (#294)
- Step 3.5 Flash: 41.7 (#106)

| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Step 3.5 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1034 | 1436 |
| HumanEval+ | 17.7% | — |
| MBPP+ | 23.3% | — |

## Reasoning

- Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 18.2 (#268)
- Step 3.5 Flash: 21.2 (#202)

| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Step 3.5 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1005 | 1411 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 28.4% |

## Math

- Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 28.3 (#230)
- Step 3.5 Flash: 40.6 (#77)

| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Step 3.5 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1047 | 1408 |
| MathArena Final-Answer Competitions | — | 66.8% |

## Knowledge

- Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 26.0 (#255)
- Step 3.5 Flash: 39.0 (#127)

| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Step 3.5 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 970 | 1422 |

## Multilingual

- Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 24.7 (#284)
- Step 3.5 Flash: 50.7 (#115)

| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Step 3.5 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 988 | 1386 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1011 | 1448 |
| LMArena German | 944 | 1404 |
| LMArena Korean | 899 | 1350 |
| LMArena Russian | 990 | 1385 |
| LMArena French | — | 1421 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1353 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1419 |

## Instruction Following

- Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 50.1 (#294)
- Step 3.5 Flash: 73.3 (#119)

| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Step 3.5 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 992 | 1385 |

## Long Context

- Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 30.5 (#281)
- Step 3.5 Flash: 42.8 (#112)

| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Step 3.5 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1003 | 1402 |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 25.3 (#301)
- Step 3.5 Flash: 59.0 (#108)

| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Step 3.5 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1022 | 1403 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 998 | 1357 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 958 | 1405 |

## FAQ

### Is Gemma 1.1 2b IT better than Step 3.5 Flash?

Step 3.5 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.7 to 28.8 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Gemma 1.1 2b IT or Step 3.5 Flash better for coding?

Step 3.5 Flash scores higher on coding benchmarks: 41.7 versus 29.6 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Gemma 1.1 2b IT and Step 3.5 Flash share?

14 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 1.1 2b IT has 16 scored results on Noometry and Step 3.5 Flash has 19.