# Gemma 1.1 2b IT vs Qwen3 Coder Next

> Qwen3 Coder Next is the stronger model overall, scoring 33.8 to 28.8 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemma-1-1-2b-it-vs-qwen3-coder-next
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 0

## Summary

- The widest gap is in coding, where Qwen3 Coder Next leads 35.8 to 29.6.

## Snapshot

| | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 28.8 | 33.8 |
| Rank | 313 | 229 |
| Context | — | 262K |
| Input $/M | — | $0.12 |
| Output $/M | — | $0.80 |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 29.6 (#294)
- Qwen3 Coder Next: 35.8 (#206)

| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| SciCode | — | 32.3% |
| WeirdML | — | 34.4% |
| LMArena Coding | 1034 | — |
| HumanEval+ | 17.7% | — |
| MBPP+ | 23.3% | — |

## Reasoning

- Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 18.2 (#268)
- Qwen3 Coder Next: 21.7 (#191)

| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| CritPt | — | 0% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1005 | — |

## Math

- Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 28.3 (#230)
- Qwen3 Coder Next: —

| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1047 | — |

## Knowledge

- Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 26.0 (#255)
- Qwen3 Coder Next: —

| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 970 | — |

## Multilingual

- Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 24.7 (#284)
- Qwen3 Coder Next: —

| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 988 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1011 | — |
| LMArena German | 944 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 899 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 990 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 50.1 (#294)
- Qwen3 Coder Next: —

| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 992 | — |

## Long Context

- Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 30.5 (#281)
- Qwen3 Coder Next: —

| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1003 | — |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 25.3 (#301)
- Qwen3 Coder Next: —

| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1022 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 998 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 958 | — |

## FAQ

### Is Gemma 1.1 2b IT better than Qwen3 Coder Next?

Qwen3 Coder Next is the stronger model overall, scoring 33.8 to 28.8 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Gemma 1.1 2b IT or Qwen3 Coder Next better for coding?

Qwen3 Coder Next scores higher on coding benchmarks: 35.8 versus 29.6 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Gemma 1.1 2b IT and Qwen3 Coder Next share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 1.1 2b IT has 16 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3 Coder Next has 3.