# Gemma 1.1 2b IT vs Qwen3.6 Plus

> Qwen3.6 Plus is the stronger model overall, scoring 47.5 to 29.3 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemma-1-1-2b-it-vs-qwen3-6-plus
- Last updated: 2026-10-12
- Shared benchmarks: 14

## Summary

- They share 14 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 1.1 2b IT scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen3.6 Plus in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Qwen3.6 Plus leads 62.2 to 25.1.
- Gemma 1.1 2b IT has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Qwen3.6 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 29.3 | 47.5 |
| Rank | 313 | 62 |
| Context | — | 1M |
| Input $/M | — | $0.50 |
| Output $/M | — | $3 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 30.1 (#299)
- Qwen3.6 Plus: 40.8 (#130)

| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Qwen3.6 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1034 | 1467 |
| SWE-bench Verified | — | 57.9% |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1461 |
| SciCode | — | 40.7% |
| ALE-Bench | — | 670.15 |
| HumanEval+ | 17.7% | — |
| MBPP+ | 23.3% | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Gemma 1.1 2b IT: —
- Qwen3.6 Plus: —

| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Qwen3.6 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| Vending-Bench 2 | — | 5,115 |

## Reasoning

- Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 19.1 (#270)
- Qwen3.6 Plus: 29.3 (#93)

| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Qwen3.6 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1005 | 1449 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 60.3% |
| CritPt | — | 2.9% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 17% |
| Thematic Generalization | — | 59.5% |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 12% |
| DTBench | — | 81.9% |
| LMCA | — | 33.1% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 147.65 |

## Math

- Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 30.8 (#232)
- Qwen3.6 Plus: 51.8 (#54)

| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Qwen3.6 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1047 | 1450 |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 38.2% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 93.3% |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 26.2% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | — | 8.3% |

## Knowledge

- Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 26.5 (#258)
- Qwen3.6 Plus: 56.1 (#45)

| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Qwen3.6 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 970 | 1454 |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 88.4% |
| SimpleQA Verified | — | 44.1% |

## Multilingual

- Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 24.6 (#289)
- Qwen3.6 Plus: 53.3 (#70)

| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Qwen3.6 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 988 | 1424 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1012 | 1477 |
| LMArena German | 944 | 1452 |
| LMArena Korean | 899 | 1379 |
| LMArena Russian | 990 | 1434 |
| LMArena French | — | 1455 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1389 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1432 |

## Instruction Following

- Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 49.9 (#299)
- Qwen3.6 Plus: 75.0 (#74)

| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Qwen3.6 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 992 | 1425 |

## Long Context

- Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 30.6 (#286)
- Qwen3.6 Plus: 45.2 (#49)

| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Qwen3.6 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1003 | 1439 |
| CL-bench | — | 20.3% |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 25.1 (#306)
- Qwen3.6 Plus: 62.2 (#82)

| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Qwen3.6 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1022 | 1437 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 998 | 1404 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 959 | 1438 |

## FAQ

### Is Gemma 1.1 2b IT better than Qwen3.6 Plus?

Qwen3.6 Plus is the stronger model overall, scoring 47.5 to 29.3 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Gemma 1.1 2b IT or Qwen3.6 Plus better for coding?

Qwen3.6 Plus scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.8 versus 30.1 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Gemma 1.1 2b IT and Qwen3.6 Plus share?

14 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 1.1 2b IT has 16 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.6 Plus has 37.