# Gemma 1.1 2b IT vs Qwen2-72B

> Gemma 1.1 2b IT and Qwen2-72B score almost the same on the Noometry Index (29.3 vs 30.0), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemma-1-1-2b-it-vs-qwen2-72b
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 14

## Summary

- They share 14 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 1.1 2b IT scores higher in 3 categories and Qwen2-72B in 5 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Qwen2-72B leads 40.8 to 25.1.

## Snapshot

| | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Qwen2-72B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 29.3 | 30.0 |
| Rank | 313 | 300 |
| Context | — | — |
| Input $/M | — | — |
| Output $/M | — | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 30.1 (#299)
- Qwen2-72B: 29.1 (#310)

| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Qwen2-72B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1034 | 1196 |
| WeirdML | — | 11.3% |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 38.5% |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 54% |
| HumanEval+ | 17.7% | — |
| MBPP+ | 23.3% | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Gemma 1.1 2b IT: —
- Qwen2-72B: 17.0 (#146)

| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Qwen2-72B |
|---|---|---|
| TheAgentCompany | — | 1.1% |
| METR Time Horizons | — | 29.9% |

## Reasoning

- Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 19.1 (#270)
- Qwen2-72B: 23.2 (#181)

| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Qwen2-72B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1005 | 1191 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 125.28 |

## Math

- Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 30.8 (#232)
- Qwen2-72B: 30.2 (#236)

| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Qwen2-72B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1047 | 1235 |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 39.1% |

## Knowledge

- Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 26.5 (#258)
- Qwen2-72B: 21.2 (#275)

| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Qwen2-72B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 970 | 1171 |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 40.8% |
| MMLU | — | 82.4% |

## Multilingual

- Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 24.6 (#289)
- Qwen2-72B: 35.9 (#244)

| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Qwen2-72B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 988 | 1176 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1012 | 1240 |
| LMArena German | 944 | 1151 |
| LMArena Korean | 899 | 1083 |
| LMArena Russian | 990 | 1169 |
| LMArena French | — | 1170 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1111 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1169 |

## Instruction Following

- Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 49.9 (#299)
- Qwen2-72B: 61.7 (#241)

| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Qwen2-72B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 992 | 1181 |

## Long Context

- Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 30.6 (#286)
- Qwen2-72B: 36.1 (#235)

| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Qwen2-72B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1003 | 1192 |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 25.1 (#306)
- Qwen2-72B: 40.8 (#241)

| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Qwen2-72B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1022 | 1203 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 998 | 1181 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 959 | 1196 |

## FAQ

### Is Gemma 1.1 2b IT better than Qwen2-72B?

Gemma 1.1 2b IT and Qwen2-72B score almost the same on the Noometry Index (29.3 vs 30.0), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

### Is Gemma 1.1 2b IT or Qwen2-72B better for coding?

Gemma 1.1 2b IT scores higher on coding benchmarks: 30.1 versus 29.1 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Gemma 1.1 2b IT and Qwen2-72B share?

14 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 1.1 2b IT has 16 scored results on Noometry and Qwen2-72B has 26.