# Gemma 1.1 2b IT vs Qwen2.5 Plus 1127

> Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.8 to 29.3 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemma-1-1-2b-it-vs-qwen2-5-plus
- Last updated: 2026-10-12
- Shared benchmarks: 13

## Summary

- They share 13 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 1.1 2b IT scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 leads 49.4 to 25.1.
- Gemma 1.1 2b IT has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 29.3 | 38.8 |
| Rank | 313 | 181 |
| Context | — | — |
| Input $/M | — | — |
| Output $/M | — | — |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 30.1 (#299)
- Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 38.5 (#175)

| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1034 | 1314 |
| HumanEval+ | 17.7% | — |
| MBPP+ | 23.3% | — |

## Reasoning

- Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 19.1 (#270)
- Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 25.9 (#141)

| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1005 | 1299 |

## Math

- Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 30.8 (#232)
- Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 36.1 (#174)

| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1047 | 1298 |

## Knowledge

- Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 26.5 (#258)
- Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 35.5 (#183)

| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 970 | 1289 |

## Multilingual

- Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 24.6 (#289)
- Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 41.9 (#201)

| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 988 | 1265 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1012 | 1314 |
| LMArena German | 944 | 1231 |
| LMArena Russian | 990 | 1271 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1207 |
| LMArena Korean | 899 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 49.9 (#299)
- Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 67.2 (#199)

| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 992 | 1275 |

## Long Context

- Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 30.6 (#286)
- Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 39.2 (#184)

| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1003 | 1292 |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 25.1 (#306)
- Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 49.4 (#192)

| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1022 | 1299 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 998 | 1262 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 959 | 1299 |

## FAQ

### Is Gemma 1.1 2b IT better than Qwen2.5 Plus 1127?

Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.8 to 29.3 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Gemma 1.1 2b IT or Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 better for coding?

Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.5 versus 30.1 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Gemma 1.1 2b IT and Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 share?

13 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 1.1 2b IT has 16 scored results on Noometry and Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 has 14.