# Gemma 1.1 2b IT vs Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B)

> Gemma 1.1 2b IT has enough public results to be ranked (#313); Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B) does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemma-1-1-2b-it-vs-qwen2-5-coder
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 0

## Snapshot

| | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B) |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 28.8 | — |
| Rank | 313 | — |
| Context | — | — |
| Input $/M | — | — |
| Output $/M | — | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 29.6 (#294)
- Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B): —

| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B) |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1034 | — |
| HumanEval+ | 17.7% | — |
| MBPP+ | 23.3% | — |

## Reasoning

- Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 18.2 (#268)
- Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B): —

| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B) |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1005 | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 112.93 |
| HellaSwag | — | 76.8% |
| WinoGrande | — | 72.9% |

## Math

- Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 28.3 (#230)
- Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B): —

| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B) |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1047 | — |
| GSM8K | — | 86.7% |

## Knowledge

- Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 26.0 (#255)
- Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B): —

| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B) |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 970 | — |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | — | 60.9% |
| MMLU | — | 68% |

## Multilingual

- Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 24.7 (#284)
- Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B): —

| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B) |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 988 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1011 | — |
| LMArena German | 944 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 899 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 990 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 50.1 (#294)
- Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B): —

| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B) |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 992 | — |

## Long Context

- Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 30.5 (#281)
- Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B): —

| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B) |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1003 | — |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 25.3 (#301)
- Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B): —

| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B) |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1022 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 998 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 958 | — |

## FAQ

### Is Gemma 1.1 2b IT better than Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B)?

Gemma 1.1 2b IT has enough public results to be ranked (#313); Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B) does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

### How many benchmarks do Gemma 1.1 2b IT and Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B) share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 1.1 2b IT has 16 scored results on Noometry and Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B) has 6.