# Gemma 1.1 2b IT vs Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct

> Gemma 1.1 2b IT and Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct score almost the same on the Noometry Index (29.3 vs 29.3), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemma-1-1-2b-it-vs-phi-3-small-8k-instruct
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 14

## Summary

- They share 14 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 1.1 2b IT scores higher in 3 categories and Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct in 5 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct leads 31.1 to 25.1.

## Snapshot

| | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | Microsoft |
| Noometry Index | 29.3 | 29.3 |
| Rank | 313 | 314 |
| Context | — | — |
| Input $/M | — | — |
| Output $/M | — | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 30.1 (#299)
- Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 27.9 (#318)

| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1034 | 1101 |
| LiveBench Coding | — | 20.3% |
| HumanEval+ | 17.7% | — |
| MBPP+ | 23.3% | — |

## Reasoning

- Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 19.1 (#270)
- Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 14.8 (#323)

| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1005 | 1100 |
| LiveBench Reasoning | — | 15.9% |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | — | 30.3% |
| Adversarial NLI | — | 58.1% |
| BIG-Bench Hard | — | 79.1% |
| HellaSwag | — | 77% |
| LiveBench | — | 24% |
| WinoGrande | — | 81.5% |

## Math

- Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 30.8 (#232)
- Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 27.6 (#248)

| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1047 | 1151 |
| LiveBench Math | — | 17.6% |

## Knowledge

- Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 26.5 (#258)
- Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 29.1 (#240)

| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 970 | 1067 |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | — | 90.7% |
| MMLU | — | 75.7% |
| OpenBookQA | — | 88% |
| TriviaQA | — | 58.1% |

## Multilingual

- Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 24.6 (#289)
- Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 28.5 (#272)

| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 988 | 1058 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1012 | 1061 |
| LMArena German | 944 | 1080 |
| LMArena Korean | 899 | 894 |
| LMArena Russian | 990 | 1111 |
| LMArena French | — | 1135 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 966 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1111 |

## Instruction Following

- Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 49.9 (#299)
- Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 51.9 (#292)

| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 992 | 1087 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | — | 47.2% |

## Long Context

- Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 30.6 (#286)
- Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 33.0 (#267)

| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1003 | 1088 |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 25.1 (#306)
- Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 31.1 (#284)

| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1022 | 1110 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 998 | 1083 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 959 | 1068 |
| LiveBench Language | — | 12.9% |

## FAQ

### Is Gemma 1.1 2b IT better than Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct?

Gemma 1.1 2b IT and Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct score almost the same on the Noometry Index (29.3 vs 29.3), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

### Is Gemma 1.1 2b IT or Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct better for coding?

Gemma 1.1 2b IT scores higher on coding benchmarks: 30.1 versus 27.9 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Gemma 1.1 2b IT and Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct share?

14 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 1.1 2b IT has 16 scored results on Noometry and Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct has 32.