# Gemma 1.1 2b IT vs Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct

> Gemma 1.1 2b IT and Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct score almost the same on the Noometry Index (29.3 vs 29.7), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemma-1-1-2b-it-vs-phi-3-mini-128k-instruct
- Last updated: 2026-10-12
- Shared benchmarks: 14

## Summary

- They share 14 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 1.1 2b IT scores higher in 2 categories and Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct in 6 categories; 3 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.

## Snapshot

| | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | Microsoft |
| Noometry Index | 29.3 | 29.7 |
| Rank | 313 | 305 |
| Context | — | — |
| Input $/M | — | — |
| Output $/M | — | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 30.1 (#299)
- Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 28.8 (#312)

| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1034 | 1039 |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 29.6% |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 40.6% |
| HumanEval+ | 17.7% | — |
| MBPP+ | 23.3% | — |

## Reasoning

- Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 19.1 (#270)
- Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 19.6 (#256)

| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1005 | 1028 |

## Math

- Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 30.8 (#232)
- Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 31.6 (#222)

| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1047 | 1089 |

## Knowledge

- Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 26.5 (#258)
- Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 26.8 (#254)

| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 970 | 984 |

## Multilingual

- Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 24.6 (#289)
- Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 25.2 (#285)

| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 988 | 1000 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1012 | 1016 |
| LMArena German | 944 | 1006 |
| LMArena Korean | 899 | 856 |
| LMArena Russian | 990 | 1004 |
| LMArena French | — | 1039 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 899 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1059 |

## Instruction Following

- Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 49.9 (#299)
- Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 51.8 (#294)

| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 992 | 1023 |

## Long Context

- Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 30.6 (#286)
- Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 30.4 (#289)

| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1003 | 996 |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 25.1 (#306)
- Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 27.1 (#301)

| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1022 | 1050 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 998 | 1024 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 959 | 989 |

## FAQ

### Is Gemma 1.1 2b IT better than Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct?

Gemma 1.1 2b IT and Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct score almost the same on the Noometry Index (29.3 vs 29.7), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

### Is Gemma 1.1 2b IT or Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct better for coding?

Gemma 1.1 2b IT scores higher on coding benchmarks: 30.1 versus 28.8 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Gemma 1.1 2b IT and Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct share?

14 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 1.1 2b IT has 16 scored results on Noometry and Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct has 19.