# Gemma 1.1 2b IT vs Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct

> Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 32.4 to 28.8 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemma-1-1-2b-it-vs-phi-3-medium-4k-instruct
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 14

## Summary

- They share 14 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 1.1 2b IT scores higher in 0 categories and Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct leads 34.3 to 25.3.

## Snapshot

| | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | Microsoft |
| Noometry Index | 28.8 | 32.4 |
| Rank | 313 | 246 |
| Context | — | — |
| Input $/M | — | — |
| Output $/M | — | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 29.6 (#294)
- Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct: 32.3 (#263)

| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1034 | 1130 |
| HumanEval+ | 17.7% | — |
| MBPP+ | 23.3% | — |

## Reasoning

- Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 18.2 (#268)
- Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct: 20.8 (#214)

| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1005 | 1127 |

## Math

- Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 28.3 (#230)
- Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct: 30.9 (#202)

| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1047 | 1173 |

## Knowledge

- Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 26.0 (#255)
- Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct: 29.6 (#226)

| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 970 | 1108 |

## Multilingual

- Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 24.7 (#284)
- Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct: 30.8 (#258)

| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 988 | 1094 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1011 | 1108 |
| LMArena German | 944 | 1101 |
| LMArena Korean | 899 | 954 |
| LMArena Russian | 990 | 1145 |
| LMArena French | — | 1109 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1042 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1095 |

## Instruction Following

- Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 50.1 (#294)
- Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct: 57.8 (#263)

| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 992 | 1114 |

## Long Context

- Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 30.5 (#281)
- Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct: 33.9 (#250)

| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1003 | 1120 |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 25.3 (#301)
- Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct: 34.3 (#267)

| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1022 | 1138 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 998 | 1106 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 958 | 1088 |

## FAQ

### Is Gemma 1.1 2b IT better than Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct?

Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 32.4 to 28.8 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Gemma 1.1 2b IT or Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct better for coding?

Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct scores higher on coding benchmarks: 32.3 versus 29.6 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Gemma 1.1 2b IT and Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct share?

14 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 1.1 2b IT has 16 scored results on Noometry and Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct has 17.