# Gemma 1.1 2b IT vs phi-3-medium 14B

> Gemma 1.1 2b IT and phi-3-medium 14B score almost the same on the Noometry Index (29.3 vs 29.7), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemma-1-1-2b-it-vs-phi-3-medium-14b
- Last updated: 2026-10-12
- Shared benchmarks: 0

## Summary

- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Gemma 1.1 2b IT leads 26.5 to 9.1.

## Snapshot

| | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | Microsoft |
| Noometry Index | 29.3 | 29.7 |
| Rank | 313 | 306 |
| Context | — | — |
| Input $/M | — | — |
| Output $/M | — | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 30.1 (#299)
- phi-3-medium 14B: 36.8 (#201)

| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 37.6% |
| LMArena Coding | 1034 | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 48.7% |
| HumanEval+ | 17.7% | — |
| MBPP+ | 23.3% | — |

## Reasoning

- Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 19.1 (#270)
- phi-3-medium 14B: —

| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1005 | — |
| Adversarial NLI | — | 55.8% |
| BIG-Bench Hard | — | 81.4% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 121.23 |
| HellaSwag | — | 82.4% |
| WinoGrande | — | 81.5% |

## Math

- Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 30.8 (#232)
- phi-3-medium 14B: 27.3 (#250)

| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1047 | — |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 17.6% |

## Knowledge

- Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 26.5 (#258)
- phi-3-medium 14B: 9.1 (#306)

| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 27.6% |
| LMArena Expert | 970 | — |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | — | 91.6% |
| MMLU | — | 78% |
| OpenBookQA | — | 87.4% |
| TriviaQA | — | 73.9% |

## Multilingual

- Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 24.6 (#289)
- phi-3-medium 14B: —

| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 988 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1012 | — |
| LMArena German | 944 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 899 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 990 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 49.9 (#299)
- phi-3-medium 14B: —

| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 992 | — |

## Long Context

- Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 30.6 (#286)
- phi-3-medium 14B: —

| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1003 | — |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 25.1 (#306)
- phi-3-medium 14B: —

| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1022 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 998 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 959 | — |

## FAQ

### Is Gemma 1.1 2b IT better than phi-3-medium 14B?

Gemma 1.1 2b IT and phi-3-medium 14B score almost the same on the Noometry Index (29.3 vs 29.7), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

### Is Gemma 1.1 2b IT or phi-3-medium 14B better for coding?

phi-3-medium 14B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 36.8 versus 30.1 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Gemma 1.1 2b IT and phi-3-medium 14B share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 1.1 2b IT has 16 scored results on Noometry and phi-3-medium 14B has 13.