# Gemma 1.1 2b IT vs o3-pro

> o3-pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.7 to 28.8 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemma-1-1-2b-it-vs-o3-pro
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 0

## Summary

- The widest gap is in long context, where o3-pro leads 72.1 to 30.5.
- Gemma 1.1 2b IT has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | o3-pro |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | OpenAI |
| Noometry Index | 28.8 | 42.7 |
| Rank | 313 | 94 |
| Context | — | 200K |
| Input $/M | — | $20 |
| Output $/M | — | $80 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 29.6 (#294)
- o3-pro: 55.1 (#22)

| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | o3-pro |
|---|---|---|
| Aider Polyglot | — | 84.9% |
| WeirdML | — | 58.2% |
| LMArena Coding | 1034 | — |
| HumanEval+ | 17.7% | — |
| MBPP+ | 23.3% | — |

## Reasoning

- Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 18.2 (#268)
- o3-pro: 24.1 (#152)

| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | o3-pro |
|---|---|---|
| ARC-AGI-2 | — | 4.9% |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 72.1% |
| ARC-AGI-1 | — | 59.3% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1005 | — |
| DTBench | — | 86.9% |
| LMCA | — | 38.5% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 147.43 |

## Math

- Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 28.3 (#230)
- o3-pro: —

| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | o3-pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1047 | — |

## Knowledge

- Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 26.0 (#255)
- o3-pro: 29.0 (#234)

| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | o3-pro |
|---|---|---|
| Confabulations | — | 14.2% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 23.3% |
| LMArena Expert | 970 | — |

## Multilingual

- Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 24.7 (#284)
- o3-pro: —

| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | o3-pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 988 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1011 | — |
| LMArena German | 944 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 899 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 990 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 50.1 (#294)
- o3-pro: —

| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | o3-pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 992 | — |

## Long Context

- Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 30.5 (#281)
- o3-pro: 72.1 (#1)

| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | o3-pro |
|---|---|---|
| Fiction.LiveBench | — | 97.2% |
| LMArena Longer Query | 1003 | — |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 25.3 (#301)
- o3-pro: 57.1 (#128)

| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | o3-pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1022 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 998 | — |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | — | 84.4% |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 958 | — |

## FAQ

### Is Gemma 1.1 2b IT better than o3-pro?

o3-pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.7 to 28.8 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Gemma 1.1 2b IT or o3-pro better for coding?

o3-pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 55.1 versus 29.6 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Gemma 1.1 2b IT and o3-pro share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 1.1 2b IT has 16 scored results on Noometry and o3-pro has 12.