# Gemma 1.1 2b IT vs o1-mini

> o1-mini is the stronger model overall, scoring 33.7 to 28.8 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemma-1-1-2b-it-vs-o1-mini
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 16

## Summary

- They share 16 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 1.1 2b IT scores higher in 1 category and o1-mini in 7 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where o1-mini leads 48.6 to 25.3.
- Gemma 1.1 2b IT has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | o1-mini |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | OpenAI |
| Noometry Index | 28.8 | 33.7 |
| Rank | 313 | 230 |
| Context | — | — |
| Input $/M | — | — |
| Output $/M | — | — |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 29.6 (#294)
- o1-mini: 35.1 (#218)

| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | o1-mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1034 | 1362 |
| HumanEval+ | 17.7% | 89% |
| MBPP+ | 23.3% | 78.8% |
| Aider Polyglot | — | 32.9% |
| WeirdML | — | 36.3% |
| LiveBench Coding | — | 48% |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Gemma 1.1 2b IT: —
- o1-mini: 24.3 (#112)

| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | o1-mini |
|---|---|---|
| Cybench | — | 10% |

## Reasoning

- Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 18.2 (#268)
- o1-mini: 8.9 (#340)

| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | o1-mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1005 | 1333 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | — | 0.8% |
| SimpleBench | — | 18.1% |
| ARC-AGI-1 | — | 14% |
| LiveBench Reasoning | — | 72.3% |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | — | 57.9% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 135.82 |
| LiveBench | — | 57.8% |

## Math

- Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 28.3 (#230)
- o1-mini: 33.7 (#168)

| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | o1-mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1047 | 1358 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 46.9% |
| LiveBench Math | — | 62% |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 89.2% |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 1.7% |

## Knowledge

- Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 26.0 (#255)
- o1-mini: 34.8 (#180)

| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | o1-mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 970 | 1316 |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 62.4% |
| Confabulations | — | 18.6% |

## Multilingual

- Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 24.7 (#284)
- o1-mini: 43.8 (#177)

| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | o1-mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 988 | 1289 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1011 | 1314 |
| LMArena German | 944 | 1278 |
| LMArena Korean | 899 | 1223 |
| LMArena Russian | 990 | 1283 |
| LMArena French | — | 1292 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1245 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1302 |

## Instruction Following

- Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 50.1 (#294)
- o1-mini: 67.0 (#200)

| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | o1-mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 992 | 1304 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | — | 65.4% |

## Long Context

- Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 30.5 (#281)
- o1-mini: 40.1 (#156)

| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | o1-mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1003 | 1321 |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 25.3 (#301)
- o1-mini: 48.6 (#196)

| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | o1-mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1022 | 1317 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 998 | 1244 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 958 | 1314 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | — | 64.9% |
| LiveBench Language | — | 40.9% |

## FAQ

### Is Gemma 1.1 2b IT better than o1-mini?

o1-mini is the stronger model overall, scoring 33.7 to 28.8 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Gemma 1.1 2b IT or o1-mini better for coding?

o1-mini scores higher on coding benchmarks: 35.1 versus 29.6 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Gemma 1.1 2b IT and o1-mini share?

16 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 1.1 2b IT has 16 scored results on Noometry and o1-mini has 39.