# Gemma 1.1 2b IT vs Mixtral 8x22B

> Gemma 1.1 2b IT is the stronger model overall, scoring 28.8 to 26.7 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemma-1-1-2b-it-vs-mixtral-8x22b
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 16

## Summary

- They share 16 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 1.1 2b IT scores higher in 3 categories and Mixtral 8x22B in 5 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Mixtral 8x22B leads 37.1 to 25.3.

## Snapshot

| | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Mixtral 8x22B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | Mistral AI |
| Noometry Index | 28.8 | 26.7 |
| Rank | 313 | 330 |
| Context | — | 64K |
| Input $/M | — | $2 |
| Output $/M | — | $6 |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 29.6 (#294)
- Mixtral 8x22B: 23.8 (#324)

| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Mixtral 8x22B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1034 | 1166 |
| HumanEval+ | 17.7% | 72% |
| MBPP+ | 23.3% | 64.3% |
| WeirdML | — | 3.2% |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 40.6% |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 50.2% |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Gemma 1.1 2b IT: —
- Mixtral 8x22B: 22.8 (#119)

| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Mixtral 8x22B |
|---|---|---|
| Cybench | — | 7.5% |

## Reasoning

- Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 18.2 (#268)
- Mixtral 8x22B: 19.1 (#246)

| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Mixtral 8x22B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1005 | 1150 |
| DTBench | — | 55.1% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 122 |
| ForecastBench | — | 56.3 |

## Math

- Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 28.3 (#230)
- Mixtral 8x22B: 21.2 (#271)

| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Mixtral 8x22B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1047 | 1184 |
| Omni-MATH | — | 16.3% |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 24.2% |

## Knowledge

- Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 26.0 (#255)
- Mixtral 8x22B: 15.1 (#288)

| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Mixtral 8x22B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 970 | 1113 |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 34.1% |
| MMLU-Pro | — | 46% |
| GPQA (HELM) | — | 33.4% |
| MMLU | — | 77.8% |

## Multilingual

- Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 24.7 (#284)
- Mixtral 8x22B: 32.9 (#250)

| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Mixtral 8x22B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 988 | 1128 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1011 | 1116 |
| LMArena German | 944 | 1141 |
| LMArena Korean | 899 | 1056 |
| LMArena Russian | 990 | 1158 |
| LMArena French | — | 1165 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1037 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1150 |

## Instruction Following

- Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 50.1 (#294)
- Mixtral 8x22B: 57.9 (#261)

| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Mixtral 8x22B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 992 | 1147 |
| IFEval | — | 72.4% |

## Long Context

- Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 30.5 (#281)
- Mixtral 8x22B: 34.6 (#242)

| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Mixtral 8x22B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1003 | 1144 |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 25.3 (#301)
- Mixtral 8x22B: 37.1 (#257)

| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Mixtral 8x22B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1022 | 1162 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 998 | 1141 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 958 | 1130 |
| WildBench | — | 71.1% |

## FAQ

### Is Gemma 1.1 2b IT better than Mixtral 8x22B?

Gemma 1.1 2b IT is the stronger model overall, scoring 28.8 to 26.7 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Gemma 1.1 2b IT or Mixtral 8x22B better for coding?

Gemma 1.1 2b IT scores higher on coding benchmarks: 29.6 versus 23.8 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Gemma 1.1 2b IT and Mixtral 8x22B share?

16 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 1.1 2b IT has 16 scored results on Noometry and Mixtral 8x22B has 34.