# Gemma 1.1 2b IT vs MiMo-V2-Pro

> MiMo-V2-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.0 to 29.3 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemma-1-1-2b-it-vs-mimo-v2-pro
- Last updated: 2026-10-11
- Shared benchmarks: 14

## Summary

- They share 14 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 1.1 2b IT scores higher in 0 categories and MiMo-V2-Pro in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where MiMo-V2-Pro leads 62.8 to 25.1.
- Gemma 1.1 2b IT has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | Xiaomi |
| Noometry Index | 29.3 | 43.0 |
| Rank | 313 | 103 |
| Context | — | 1.05M |
| Input $/M | — | $0.43 |
| Output $/M | — | $0.87 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 30.1 (#299)
- MiMo-V2-Pro: 43.8 (#83)

| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1034 | 1476 |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1433 |
| ALE-Bench | — | 785.17 |
| HumanEval+ | 17.7% | — |
| MBPP+ | 23.3% | — |

## Reasoning

- Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 19.1 (#270)
- MiMo-V2-Pro: 22.1 (#206)

| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1005 | 1457 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 25.8% |
| Thematic Generalization | — | 45.9% |

## Math

- Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 30.8 (#232)
- MiMo-V2-Pro: 39.5 (#102)

| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1047 | 1447 |

## Knowledge

- Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 26.5 (#258)
- MiMo-V2-Pro: 41.4 (#111)

| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 970 | 1478 |

## Multilingual

- Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 24.6 (#289)
- MiMo-V2-Pro: 52.7 (#81)

| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 988 | 1416 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1012 | 1456 |
| LMArena German | 944 | 1417 |
| LMArena Korean | 899 | 1400 |
| LMArena Russian | 990 | 1427 |
| LMArena French | — | 1469 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1366 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1457 |

## Instruction Following

- Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 49.9 (#299)
- MiMo-V2-Pro: 76.0 (#49)

| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 992 | 1445 |

## Long Context

- Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 30.6 (#286)
- MiMo-V2-Pro: 41.5 (#138)

| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1003 | 1455 |
| CL-bench | — | 15.7% |
| CL-bench Life | — | 6.9% |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 25.1 (#306)
- MiMo-V2-Pro: 62.8 (#70)

| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1022 | 1436 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 998 | 1415 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 959 | 1456 |

## FAQ

### Is Gemma 1.1 2b IT better than MiMo-V2-Pro?

MiMo-V2-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.0 to 29.3 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Gemma 1.1 2b IT or MiMo-V2-Pro better for coding?

MiMo-V2-Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.8 versus 30.1 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Gemma 1.1 2b IT and MiMo-V2-Pro share?

14 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 1.1 2b IT has 16 scored results on Noometry and MiMo-V2-Pro has 23.