# Gemma 1.1 2b IT vs MiMo-V2-Flash

> MiMo-V2-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.3 to 29.3 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemma-1-1-2b-it-vs-mimo-v2-flash
- Last updated: 2026-10-11
- Shared benchmarks: 14

## Summary

- They share 14 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 1.1 2b IT scores higher in 0 categories and MiMo-V2-Flash in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where MiMo-V2-Flash leads 59.7 to 25.1.

## Snapshot

| | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | Xiaomi |
| Noometry Index | 29.3 | 41.3 |
| Rank | 313 | 138 |
| Context | — | 262K |
| Input $/M | — | $0.14 |
| Output $/M | — | $0.28 |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 30.1 (#299)
- MiMo-V2-Flash: 36.1 (#211)

| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1034 | 1443 |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1330 |
| SciCode | — | 25.9% |
| ALE-Bench | — | 737.95 |
| HumanEval+ | 17.7% | — |
| MBPP+ | 23.3% | — |

## Reasoning

- Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 19.1 (#270)
- MiMo-V2-Flash: 24.9 (#157)

| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1005 | 1420 |
| CritPt | — | 0% |

## Math

- Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 30.8 (#232)
- MiMo-V2-Flash: 38.3 (#139)

| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1047 | 1396 |

## Knowledge

- Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 26.5 (#258)
- MiMo-V2-Flash: 39.7 (#131)

| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 970 | 1425 |

## Multilingual

- Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 24.6 (#289)
- MiMo-V2-Flash: 51.0 (#113)

| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 988 | 1392 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1012 | 1462 |
| LMArena German | 944 | 1395 |
| LMArena Korean | 899 | 1358 |
| LMArena Russian | 990 | 1387 |
| LMArena French | — | 1429 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1325 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1420 |

## Instruction Following

- Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 49.9 (#299)
- MiMo-V2-Flash: 73.5 (#120)

| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 992 | 1392 |

## Long Context

- Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 30.6 (#286)
- MiMo-V2-Flash: 43.0 (#110)

| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1003 | 1409 |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 25.1 (#306)
- MiMo-V2-Flash: 59.7 (#106)

| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1022 | 1411 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 998 | 1375 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 959 | 1404 |

## FAQ

### Is Gemma 1.1 2b IT better than MiMo-V2-Flash?

MiMo-V2-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.3 to 29.3 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Gemma 1.1 2b IT or MiMo-V2-Flash better for coding?

MiMo-V2-Flash scores higher on coding benchmarks: 36.1 versus 30.1 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Gemma 1.1 2b IT and MiMo-V2-Flash share?

14 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 1.1 2b IT has 16 scored results on Noometry and MiMo-V2-Flash has 21.