# Gemma 1.1 2b IT vs MiMo-V2.5

> MiMo-V2.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.0 to 28.8 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemma-1-1-2b-it-vs-mimo-v2-5
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 14

## Summary

- They share 14 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 1.1 2b IT scores higher in 0 categories and MiMo-V2.5 in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where MiMo-V2.5 leads 61.8 to 25.3.

## Snapshot

| | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | MiMo-V2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | Xiaomi |
| Noometry Index | 28.8 | 43.0 |
| Rank | 313 | 89 |
| Context | — | 1.05M |
| Input $/M | — | $0.14 |
| Output $/M | — | $0.28 |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 29.6 (#294)
- MiMo-V2.5: 43.6 (#75)

| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | MiMo-V2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1034 | 1469 |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1438 |
| SciCode | — | 43.1% |
| ALE-Bench | — | 513.95 |
| HumanEval+ | 17.7% | — |
| MBPP+ | 23.3% | — |

## Reasoning

- Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 18.2 (#268)
- MiMo-V2.5: 27.8 (#98)

| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | MiMo-V2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1005 | 1450 |
| CritPt | — | 3.7% |

## Math

- Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 28.3 (#230)
- MiMo-V2.5: 35.4 (#145)

| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | MiMo-V2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1047 | 1436 |
| ProofBench | — | 16% |

## Knowledge

- Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 26.0 (#255)
- MiMo-V2.5: 40.2 (#109)

| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | MiMo-V2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 970 | 1459 |

## Multimodal

- Gemma 1.1 2b IT: —
- MiMo-V2.5: 39.0 (#53)

| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | MiMo-V2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1245 |

## Multilingual

- Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 24.7 (#284)
- MiMo-V2.5: 52.0 (#96)

| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | MiMo-V2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 988 | 1404 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1011 | 1467 |
| LMArena German | 944 | 1421 |
| LMArena Korean | 899 | 1363 |
| LMArena Russian | 990 | 1395 |
| LMArena French | — | 1447 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1304 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1412 |

## Instruction Following

- Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 50.1 (#294)
- MiMo-V2.5: 75.7 (#55)

| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | MiMo-V2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 992 | 1433 |

## Long Context

- Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 30.5 (#281)
- MiMo-V2.5: 44.1 (#69)

| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | MiMo-V2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1003 | 1444 |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 25.3 (#301)
- MiMo-V2.5: 61.8 (#82)

| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | MiMo-V2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1022 | 1427 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 998 | 1392 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 958 | 1445 |

## FAQ

### Is Gemma 1.1 2b IT better than MiMo-V2.5?

MiMo-V2.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.0 to 28.8 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Gemma 1.1 2b IT or MiMo-V2.5 better for coding?

MiMo-V2.5 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.6 versus 29.6 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Gemma 1.1 2b IT and MiMo-V2.5 share?

14 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 1.1 2b IT has 16 scored results on Noometry and MiMo-V2.5 has 23.