# Gemma 1.1 2b IT vs MiMo-V2.5-Pro

> MiMo-V2.5-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 44.8 to 28.8 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemma-1-1-2b-it-vs-mimo-v2-5-pro
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 14

## Summary

- They share 14 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 1.1 2b IT scores higher in 0 categories and MiMo-V2.5-Pro in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads 65.5 to 25.3.

## Snapshot

| | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | Xiaomi |
| Noometry Index | 28.8 | 44.8 |
| Rank | 313 | 70 |
| Context | — | 1.05M |
| Input $/M | — | $0.43 |
| Output $/M | — | $0.87 |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 29.6 (#294)
- MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 47.0 (#58)

| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1034 | 1502 |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1477 |
| SciCode | — | 50.2% |
| ALE-Bench | — | 899.8 |
| HumanEval+ | 17.7% | — |
| MBPP+ | 23.3% | — |

## Reasoning

- Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 18.2 (#268)
- MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 25.9 (#124)

| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1005 | 1487 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 34.4% |
| CritPt | — | 4% |
| DTBench | — | 84.5% |
| LMCA | — | 29.5% |

## Math

- Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 28.3 (#230)
- MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 38.6 (#84)

| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1047 | 1480 |
| ProofBench | — | 22% |

## Knowledge

- Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 26.0 (#255)
- MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 41.5 (#100)

| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 970 | 1501 |

## Multilingual

- Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 24.7 (#284)
- MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 55.3 (#33)

| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 988 | 1449 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1011 | 1507 |
| LMArena German | 944 | 1455 |
| LMArena Korean | 899 | 1436 |
| LMArena Russian | 990 | 1450 |
| LMArena French | — | 1489 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1418 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1470 |

## Instruction Following

- Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 50.1 (#294)
- MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 77.6 (#21)

| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 992 | 1477 |

## Long Context

- Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 30.5 (#281)
- MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 45.4 (#38)

| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1003 | 1482 |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 25.3 (#301)
- MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 65.5 (#47)

| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1022 | 1465 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 998 | 1440 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 958 | 1477 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 1493 |
| EQ-Bench 4 | — | 1208 |

## FAQ

### Is Gemma 1.1 2b IT better than MiMo-V2.5-Pro?

MiMo-V2.5-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 44.8 to 28.8 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Gemma 1.1 2b IT or MiMo-V2.5-Pro better for coding?

MiMo-V2.5-Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 47.0 versus 29.6 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Gemma 1.1 2b IT and MiMo-V2.5-Pro share?

14 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 1.1 2b IT has 16 scored results on Noometry and MiMo-V2.5-Pro has 27.