# Gemma 1.1 2b IT vs Mercury

> Mercury is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.3 to 28.8 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemma-1-1-2b-it-vs-mercury
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 8

## Summary

- They share 8 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 1.1 2b IT scores higher in 1 category and Mercury in 5 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Mercury leads 46.2 to 25.3.
- Gemma 1.1 2b IT has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Mercury |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | Inception |
| Noometry Index | 28.8 | 37.3 |
| Rank | 313 | 192 |
| Context | — | — |
| Input $/M | — | — |
| Output $/M | — | — |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 29.6 (#294)
- Mercury: 38.1 (#164)

| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Mercury |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1034 | 1323 |
| HumanEval+ | 17.7% | — |
| MBPP+ | 23.3% | — |

## Reasoning

- Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 18.2 (#268)
- Mercury: 16.8 (#288)

| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Mercury |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1005 | 1284 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 21.6% |

## Math

- Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 28.3 (#230)
- Mercury: —

| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Mercury |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1047 | — |

## Knowledge

- Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 26.0 (#255)
- Mercury: —

| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Mercury |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 970 | — |

## Multilingual

- Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 24.7 (#284)
- Mercury: 41.7 (#201)

| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Mercury |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 988 | 1259 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1011 | — |
| LMArena German | 944 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 899 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 990 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 50.1 (#294)
- Mercury: 65.3 (#220)

| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Mercury |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 992 | 1238 |

## Long Context

- Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 30.5 (#281)
- Mercury: 38.3 (#193)

| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Mercury |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1003 | 1264 |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 25.3 (#301)
- Mercury: 46.2 (#216)

| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Mercury |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1022 | 1282 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 998 | 1186 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 958 | 1283 |

## FAQ

### Is Gemma 1.1 2b IT better than Mercury?

Mercury is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.3 to 28.8 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Gemma 1.1 2b IT or Mercury better for coding?

Mercury scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.1 versus 29.6 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Gemma 1.1 2b IT and Mercury share?

8 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 1.1 2b IT has 16 scored results on Noometry and Mercury has 9.