# Gemma 1.1 2b IT vs Magistral Small

> Gemma 1.1 2b IT and Magistral Small score almost the same on the Noometry Index (29.3 vs 30.2), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemma-1-1-2b-it-vs-magistral-small
- Last updated: 2026-10-12
- Shared benchmarks: 0

## Summary

- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Gemma 1.1 2b IT leads 19.1 to 6.8.

## Snapshot

| | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Magistral Small |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | Mistral AI |
| Noometry Index | 29.3 | 30.2 |
| Rank | 313 | 296 |
| Context | — | 128K |
| Input $/M | — | $0.50 |
| Output $/M | — | $1.50 |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 30.1 (#299)
- Magistral Small: 38.4 (#176)

| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Magistral Small |
|---|---|---|
| SciCode | — | 35.2% |
| LMArena Coding | 1034 | — |
| HumanEval+ | 17.7% | — |
| MBPP+ | 23.3% | — |

## Reasoning

- Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 19.1 (#270)
- Magistral Small: 6.8 (#350)

| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Magistral Small |
|---|---|---|
| ARC-AGI-2 | — | 0% |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 6.3% |
| ARC-AGI-1 | — | 5% |
| CritPt | — | 0.3% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 3% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1005 | — |
| DTBench | — | 61.3% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 133.19 |

## Math

- Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 30.8 (#232)
- Magistral Small: 26.2 (#261)

| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Magistral Small |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 30% |
| LMArena Math | 1047 | — |

## Knowledge

- Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 26.5 (#258)
- Magistral Small: 30.9 (#223)

| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Magistral Small |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 56.1% |
| LMArena Expert | 970 | — |

## Multilingual

- Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 24.6 (#289)
- Magistral Small: —

| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Magistral Small |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 988 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1012 | — |
| LMArena German | 944 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 899 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 990 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 49.9 (#299)
- Magistral Small: —

| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Magistral Small |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 992 | — |

## Long Context

- Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 30.6 (#286)
- Magistral Small: —

| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Magistral Small |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1003 | — |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 25.1 (#306)
- Magistral Small: —

| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Magistral Small |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1022 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 998 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 959 | — |

## FAQ

### Is Gemma 1.1 2b IT better than Magistral Small?

Gemma 1.1 2b IT and Magistral Small score almost the same on the Noometry Index (29.3 vs 30.2), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

### Is Gemma 1.1 2b IT or Magistral Small better for coding?

Magistral Small scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.4 versus 30.1 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Gemma 1.1 2b IT and Magistral Small share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 1.1 2b IT has 16 scored results on Noometry and Magistral Small has 10.