# Gemma 1.1 2b IT vs Magistral Medium

> Magistral Medium is the stronger model overall, scoring 35.2 to 29.3 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemma-1-1-2b-it-vs-magistral-medium
- Last updated: 2026-10-12
- Shared benchmarks: 14

## Summary

- They share 14 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 1.1 2b IT scores higher in 1 category and Magistral Medium in 7 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Magistral Medium leads 46.3 to 25.1.

## Snapshot

| | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Magistral Medium |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | Mistral AI |
| Noometry Index | 29.3 | 35.2 |
| Rank | 313 | 227 |
| Context | — | 262K |
| Input $/M | — | $2 |
| Output $/M | — | $5 |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 30.1 (#299)
- Magistral Medium: 39.1 (#161)

| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Magistral Medium |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1034 | 1319 |
| SciCode | — | 39.2% |
| HumanEval+ | 17.7% | — |
| MBPP+ | 23.3% | — |

## Reasoning

- Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 19.1 (#270)
- Magistral Medium: 8.6 (#348)

| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Magistral Medium |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1005 | 1267 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | — | 0% |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 16.2% |
| ARC-AGI-1 | — | 6.1% |
| CritPt | — | 0.3% |

## Math

- Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 30.8 (#232)
- Magistral Medium: 35.1 (#189)

| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Magistral Medium |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1047 | 1250 |

## Knowledge

- Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 26.5 (#258)
- Magistral Medium: 33.5 (#202)

| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Magistral Medium |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 970 | 1223 |

## Multilingual

- Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 24.6 (#289)
- Magistral Medium: 39.6 (#224)

| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Magistral Medium |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 988 | 1232 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1012 | 1227 |
| LMArena German | 944 | 1248 |
| LMArena Korean | 899 | 1125 |
| LMArena Russian | 990 | 1224 |
| LMArena French | — | 1267 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1175 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1271 |

## Instruction Following

- Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 49.9 (#299)
- Magistral Medium: 66.0 (#211)

| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Magistral Medium |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 992 | 1254 |

## Long Context

- Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 30.6 (#286)
- Magistral Medium: 39.3 (#183)

| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Magistral Medium |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1003 | 1295 |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 25.1 (#306)
- Magistral Medium: 46.3 (#219)

| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Magistral Medium |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1022 | 1255 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 998 | 1245 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 959 | 1275 |

## FAQ

### Is Gemma 1.1 2b IT better than Magistral Medium?

Magistral Medium is the stronger model overall, scoring 35.2 to 29.3 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Gemma 1.1 2b IT or Magistral Medium better for coding?

Magistral Medium scores higher on coding benchmarks: 39.1 versus 30.1 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Gemma 1.1 2b IT and Magistral Medium share?

14 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 1.1 2b IT has 16 scored results on Noometry and Magistral Medium has 22.