# Gemma 1.1 2b IT vs Llama 3-70B

> Gemma 1.1 2b IT and Llama 3-70B score almost the same on the Noometry Index (29.3 vs 28.8), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemma-1-1-2b-it-vs-llama-3-70b
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 16

## Summary

- They share 16 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 1.1 2b IT scores higher in 3 categories and Llama 3-70B in 5 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Gemma 1.1 2b IT leads 30.8 to 12.8.

## Snapshot

| | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Llama 3-70B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | Meta |
| Noometry Index | 29.3 | 28.8 |
| Rank | 313 | 323 |
| Context | — | — |
| Input $/M | — | — |
| Output $/M | — | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 30.1 (#299)
- Llama 3-70B: 35.8 (#218)

| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Llama 3-70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1034 | 1206 |
| HumanEval+ | 17.7% | 72% |
| MBPP+ | 23.3% | 69% |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 43.6% |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 54.5% |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Gemma 1.1 2b IT: —
- Llama 3-70B: 21.1 (#139)

| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Llama 3-70B |
|---|---|---|
| Cybench | — | 5% |

## Reasoning

- Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 19.1 (#270)
- Llama 3-70B: 18.0 (#288)

| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Llama 3-70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1005 | 1195 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 35.1% |
| DTBench | — | 54.2% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 122.93 |
| ForecastBench | — | 57.1 |
| WinoGrande | — | 83.5% |

## Math

- Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 30.8 (#232)
- Llama 3-70B: 12.8 (#305)

| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Llama 3-70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1047 | 1218 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 4.3% |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 22.6% |

## Knowledge

- Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 26.5 (#258)
- Llama 3-70B: 20.8 (#277)

| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Llama 3-70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 970 | 1149 |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 40.6% |
| MMLU | — | 79.3% |

## Multilingual

- Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 24.6 (#289)
- Llama 3-70B: 33.6 (#251)

| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Llama 3-70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 988 | 1142 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1012 | 1114 |
| LMArena German | 944 | 1169 |
| LMArena Korean | 899 | 1017 |
| LMArena Russian | 990 | 1159 |
| LMArena French | — | 1232 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1017 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1241 |

## Instruction Following

- Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 49.9 (#299)
- Llama 3-70B: 62.5 (#238)

| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Llama 3-70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 992 | 1194 |

## Long Context

- Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 30.6 (#286)
- Llama 3-70B: 35.6 (#240)

| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Llama 3-70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1003 | 1174 |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 25.1 (#306)
- Llama 3-70B: 42.8 (#231)

| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Llama 3-70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1022 | 1221 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 998 | 1210 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 959 | 1223 |

## FAQ

### Is Gemma 1.1 2b IT better than Llama 3-70B?

Gemma 1.1 2b IT and Llama 3-70B score almost the same on the Noometry Index (29.3 vs 28.8), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

### Is Gemma 1.1 2b IT or Llama 3-70B better for coding?

Llama 3-70B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 35.8 versus 30.1 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Gemma 1.1 2b IT and Llama 3-70B share?

16 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 1.1 2b IT has 16 scored results on Noometry and Llama 3-70B has 31.