# Gemma 1.1 2b IT vs Kimi K2.7 Code

> Kimi K2.7 Code is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.3 to 29.3 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemma-1-1-2b-it-vs-kimi-k2-7-code
- Last updated: 2026-10-11
- Shared benchmarks: 0

## Summary

- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Kimi K2.7 Code leads 53.5 to 26.5.

## Snapshot

| | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Kimi K2.7 Code |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | Moonshot AI |
| Noometry Index | 29.3 | 43.3 |
| Rank | 313 | 94 |
| Context | — | 262K |
| Input $/M | — | $0.95 |
| Output $/M | — | $4 |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 30.1 (#299)
- Kimi K2.7 Code: 42.9 (#95)

| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Kimi K2.7 Code |
|---|---|---|
| DeepSWE | — | 30.5% |
| FrontierCode | — | 30.1% |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1473 |
| SciCode | — | 47.5% |
| WeirdML | — | 54.1% |
| LMArena Coding | 1034 | — |
| ALE-Bench | — | 886.23 |
| HumanEval+ | 17.7% | — |
| MBPP+ | 23.3% | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Gemma 1.1 2b IT: —
- Kimi K2.7 Code: 24.0 (#122)

| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Kimi K2.7 Code |
|---|---|---|
| APEX-Agents | — | 37.6% |
| GBAEval | — | 0.9% |
| Vending-Bench 2 | — | 5,083 |

## Reasoning

- Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 19.1 (#270)
- Kimi K2.7 Code: 39.0 (#61)

| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Kimi K2.7 Code |
|---|---|---|
| SimpleBench | — | 57.9% |
| CritPt | — | 10% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 21% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1005 | — |
| Surface Evolver Bench | — | 48.8% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 149.97 |

## Math

- Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 30.8 (#232)
- Kimi K2.7 Code: 52.9 (#48)

| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Kimi K2.7 Code |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 54% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | — | 12.2% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 95.6% |
| LMArena Math | 1047 | — |

## Knowledge

- Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 26.5 (#258)
- Kimi K2.7 Code: 53.5 (#57)

| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Kimi K2.7 Code |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 87.9% |
| SimpleQA Verified | — | 36.5% |
| LMArena Expert | 970 | — |

## Multilingual

- Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 24.6 (#289)
- Kimi K2.7 Code: —

| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Kimi K2.7 Code |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 988 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1012 | — |
| LMArena German | 944 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 899 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 990 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 49.9 (#299)
- Kimi K2.7 Code: —

| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Kimi K2.7 Code |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 992 | — |

## Long Context

- Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 30.6 (#286)
- Kimi K2.7 Code: —

| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Kimi K2.7 Code |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1003 | — |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 25.1 (#306)
- Kimi K2.7 Code: —

| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Kimi K2.7 Code |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1022 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 998 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 959 | — |

## FAQ

### Is Gemma 1.1 2b IT better than Kimi K2.7 Code?

Kimi K2.7 Code is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.3 to 29.3 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Gemma 1.1 2b IT or Kimi K2.7 Code better for coding?

Kimi K2.7 Code scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.9 versus 30.1 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Gemma 1.1 2b IT and Kimi K2.7 Code share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 1.1 2b IT has 16 scored results on Noometry and Kimi K2.7 Code has 19.