# Gemma 1.1 2b IT vs Grok-2 (Dec 2024)

> Grok-2 (Dec 2024) is the stronger model overall, scoring 33.4 to 28.8 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemma-1-1-2b-it-vs-grok-2
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 14

## Summary

- They share 14 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 1.1 2b IT scores higher in 2 categories and Grok-2 (Dec 2024) in 6 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Grok-2 (Dec 2024) leads 48.8 to 25.3.
- Gemma 1.1 2b IT has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Grok-2 (Dec 2024) |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | xAI |
| Noometry Index | 28.8 | 33.4 |
| Rank | 313 | 233 |
| Context | — | — |
| Input $/M | — | — |
| Output $/M | — | — |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 29.6 (#294)
- Grok-2 (Dec 2024): 32.9 (#254)

| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Grok-2 (Dec 2024) |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1034 | 1288 |
| WeirdML | — | 22.2% |
| LiveBench Coding | — | 46.4% |
| HumanEval+ | 17.7% | — |
| MBPP+ | 23.3% | — |

## Reasoning

- Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 18.2 (#268)
- Grok-2 (Dec 2024): 16.4 (#294)

| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Grok-2 (Dec 2024) |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1005 | 1272 |
| SimpleBench | — | 22.7% |
| LiveBench Reasoning | — | 54.8% |
| DTBench | — | 65.2% |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | — | 54.5% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 130.48 |
| LiveBench | — | 54.3% |

## Math

- Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 28.3 (#230)
- Grok-2 (Dec 2024): 19.6 (#278)

| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Grok-2 (Dec 2024) |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1047 | 1283 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 11.5% |
| LiveBench Math | — | 54.9% |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 63.5% |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 0.7% |

## Knowledge

- Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 26.0 (#255)
- Grok-2 (Dec 2024): 29.8 (#225)

| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Grok-2 (Dec 2024) |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 970 | 1254 |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 53.8% |
| Confabulations | — | 20.1% |

## Multilingual

- Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 24.7 (#284)
- Grok-2 (Dec 2024): 43.3 (#183)

| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Grok-2 (Dec 2024) |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 988 | 1282 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1011 | 1289 |
| LMArena German | 944 | 1287 |
| LMArena Korean | 899 | 1237 |
| LMArena Russian | 990 | 1286 |
| LMArena French | — | 1317 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1244 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1281 |

## Instruction Following

- Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 50.1 (#294)
- Grok-2 (Dec 2024): 67.1 (#197)

| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Grok-2 (Dec 2024) |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 992 | 1270 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | — | 69.6% |

## Long Context

- Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 30.5 (#281)
- Grok-2 (Dec 2024): 38.7 (#186)

| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Grok-2 (Dec 2024) |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1003 | 1276 |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 25.3 (#301)
- Grok-2 (Dec 2024): 48.8 (#192)

| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Grok-2 (Dec 2024) |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1022 | 1305 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 998 | 1284 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 958 | 1290 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | — | 63.6% |
| LiveBench Language | — | 45.6% |

## FAQ

### Is Gemma 1.1 2b IT better than Grok-2 (Dec 2024)?

Grok-2 (Dec 2024) is the stronger model overall, scoring 33.4 to 28.8 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Gemma 1.1 2b IT or Grok-2 (Dec 2024) better for coding?

Grok-2 (Dec 2024) scores higher on coding benchmarks: 32.9 versus 29.6 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Gemma 1.1 2b IT and Grok-2 (Dec 2024) share?

14 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 1.1 2b IT has 16 scored results on Noometry and Grok-2 (Dec 2024) has 34.