# Gemma 1.1 2b IT vs Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13

> Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.0 to 28.8 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemma-1-1-2b-it-vs-grok-2-mini
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 14

## Summary

- They share 14 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 1.1 2b IT scores higher in 0 categories and Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 leads 47.5 to 25.3.
- Gemma 1.1 2b IT has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | xAI |
| Noometry Index | 28.8 | 37.0 |
| Rank | 313 | 196 |
| Context | — | — |
| Input $/M | — | — |
| Output $/M | — | — |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 29.6 (#294)
- Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13: 36.4 (#194)

| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1034 | 1269 |
| HumanEval+ | 17.7% | — |
| MBPP+ | 23.3% | — |

## Reasoning

- Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 18.2 (#268)
- Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13: 23.7 (#162)

| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1005 | 1255 |

## Math

- Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 28.3 (#230)
- Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13: 32.8 (#185)

| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1047 | 1265 |

## Knowledge

- Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 26.0 (#255)
- Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13: 33.4 (#195)

| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 970 | 1238 |

## Multilingual

- Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 24.7 (#284)
- Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13: 41.6 (#203)

| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 988 | 1257 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1011 | 1262 |
| LMArena German | 944 | 1273 |
| LMArena Korean | 899 | 1195 |
| LMArena Russian | 990 | 1261 |
| LMArena French | — | 1285 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1213 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1278 |

## Instruction Following

- Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 50.1 (#294)
- Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13: 65.7 (#215)

| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 992 | 1245 |

## Long Context

- Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 30.5 (#281)
- Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13: 38.4 (#191)

| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1003 | 1267 |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 25.3 (#301)
- Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13: 47.5 (#207)

| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1022 | 1281 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 998 | 1242 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 958 | 1265 |

## FAQ

### Is Gemma 1.1 2b IT better than Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13?

Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.0 to 28.8 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Gemma 1.1 2b IT or Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 better for coding?

Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 36.4 versus 29.6 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Gemma 1.1 2b IT and Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 share?

14 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 1.1 2b IT has 16 scored results on Noometry and Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 has 17.