# Gemma 1.1 2b IT vs Granite 3.0 2b Instruct

> Granite 3.0 2b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 30.8 to 29.3 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemma-1-1-2b-it-vs-granite-3-0-2b-instruct
- Last updated: 2026-10-12
- Shared benchmarks: 12

## Summary

- They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 1.1 2b IT scores higher in 1 category and Granite 3.0 2b Instruct in 7 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Granite 3.0 2b Instruct leads 29.6 to 25.1.

## Snapshot

| | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Granite 3.0 2b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | IBM |
| Noometry Index | 29.3 | 30.8 |
| Rank | 313 | 286 |
| Context | — | — |
| Input $/M | — | — |
| Output $/M | — | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 30.1 (#299)
- Granite 3.0 2b Instruct: 28.3 (#316)

| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Granite 3.0 2b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1034 | 1090 |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 20.5% |
| HumanEval+ | 17.7% | — |
| MBPP+ | 23.3% | — |

## Reasoning

- Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 19.1 (#270)
- Granite 3.0 2b Instruct: 20.5 (#235)

| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Granite 3.0 2b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1005 | 1073 |

## Math

- Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 30.8 (#232)
- Granite 3.0 2b Instruct: 32.2 (#217)

| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Granite 3.0 2b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1047 | 1117 |

## Knowledge

- Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 26.5 (#258)
- Granite 3.0 2b Instruct: 29.0 (#241)

| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Granite 3.0 2b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 970 | 1064 |

## Multilingual

- Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 24.6 (#289)
- Granite 3.0 2b Instruct: 27.0 (#278)

| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Granite 3.0 2b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 988 | 1033 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1012 | 1070 |
| LMArena Russian | 990 | 1045 |
| LMArena German | 944 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 899 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 49.9 (#299)
- Granite 3.0 2b Instruct: 53.9 (#284)

| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Granite 3.0 2b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 992 | 1056 |

## Long Context

- Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 30.6 (#286)
- Granite 3.0 2b Instruct: 32.5 (#268)

| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Granite 3.0 2b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1003 | 1070 |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 25.1 (#306)
- Granite 3.0 2b Instruct: 29.6 (#292)

| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Granite 3.0 2b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1022 | 1080 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 998 | 1046 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 959 | 1053 |

## FAQ

### Is Gemma 1.1 2b IT better than Granite 3.0 2b Instruct?

Granite 3.0 2b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 30.8 to 29.3 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Gemma 1.1 2b IT or Granite 3.0 2b Instruct better for coding?

Gemma 1.1 2b IT scores higher on coding benchmarks: 30.1 versus 28.3 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Gemma 1.1 2b IT and Granite 3.0 2b Instruct share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 1.1 2b IT has 16 scored results on Noometry and Granite 3.0 2b Instruct has 13.