# Gemma 1.1 2b IT vs GPT-5.2 Pro

> GPT-5.2 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 52.3 to 29.3 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemma-1-1-2b-it-vs-gpt-5-2-pro
- Last updated: 2026-10-12
- Shared benchmarks: 0

## Summary

- The widest gap is in math, where GPT-5.2 Pro leads 65.3 to 30.8.
- Gemma 1.1 2b IT has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | GPT-5.2 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | OpenAI |
| Noometry Index | 29.3 | 52.3 |
| Rank | 313 | 39 |
| Context | — | 400K |
| Input $/M | — | $21 |
| Output $/M | — | $168 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 30.1 (#299)
- GPT-5.2 Pro: —

| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | GPT-5.2 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1034 | — |
| HumanEval+ | 17.7% | — |
| MBPP+ | 23.3% | — |

## Reasoning

- Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 19.1 (#270)
- GPT-5.2 Pro: 51.5 (#33)

| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | GPT-5.2 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| ARC-AGI-2 | — | 54.2% |
| SimpleBench | — | 57.4% |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 79.3% |
| ARC-AGI-1 | — | 90.5% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1005 | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 155.4 |

## Math

- Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 30.8 (#232)
- GPT-5.2 Pro: 65.3 (#29)

| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | GPT-5.2 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 74% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | — | 46% |
| LMArena Math | 1047 | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | — | 31.3% |

## Knowledge

- Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 26.5 (#258)
- GPT-5.2 Pro: —

| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | GPT-5.2 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 970 | — |

## Multilingual

- Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 24.6 (#289)
- GPT-5.2 Pro: —

| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | GPT-5.2 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 988 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1012 | — |
| LMArena German | 944 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 899 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 990 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 49.9 (#299)
- GPT-5.2 Pro: —

| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | GPT-5.2 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 992 | — |

## Long Context

- Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 30.6 (#286)
- GPT-5.2 Pro: —

| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | GPT-5.2 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1003 | — |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 25.1 (#306)
- GPT-5.2 Pro: —

| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | GPT-5.2 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1022 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 998 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 959 | — |

## FAQ

### Is Gemma 1.1 2b IT better than GPT-5.2 Pro?

GPT-5.2 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 52.3 to 29.3 on the Noometry Index.

### How many benchmarks do Gemma 1.1 2b IT and GPT-5.2 Pro share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 1.1 2b IT has 16 scored results on Noometry and GPT-5.2 Pro has 8.