# Gemma 1.1 2b IT vs GLM-4.5

> GLM-4.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.4 to 28.8 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemma-1-1-2b-it-vs-glm-4-5
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 14

## Summary

- They share 14 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 1.1 2b IT scores higher in 0 categories and GLM-4.5 in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where GLM-4.5 leads 57.7 to 25.3.

## Snapshot

| | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | GLM-4.5 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | Z.ai (Zhipu) |
| Noometry Index | 28.8 | 41.4 |
| Rank | 313 | 125 |
| Context | — | 131K |
| Input $/M | — | $0.60 |
| Output $/M | — | $2.20 |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 29.6 (#294)
- GLM-4.5: 41.1 (#121)

| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | GLM-4.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1034 | 1434 |
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | — | 54.2% |
| WeirdML | — | 40.6% |
| ALE-Bench | — | 344.82 |
| AlgoTune | — | 1.52 |
| HumanEval+ | 17.7% | — |
| MBPP+ | 23.3% | — |

## Reasoning

- Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 18.2 (#268)
- GLM-4.5: 27.7 (#99)

| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | GLM-4.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1005 | 1430 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 57.9% |

## Math

- Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 28.3 (#230)
- GLM-4.5: 36.3 (#119)

| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | GLM-4.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1047 | 1427 |

## Knowledge

- Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 26.0 (#255)
- GLM-4.5: 35.5 (#172)

| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | GLM-4.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 970 | 1433 |
| Humanity's Last Exam | — | 8.3% |
| Confabulations | — | 11.3% |

## Multilingual

- Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 24.7 (#284)
- GLM-4.5: 53.0 (#74)

| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | GLM-4.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 988 | 1417 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1011 | 1465 |
| LMArena German | 944 | 1406 |
| LMArena Korean | 899 | 1382 |
| LMArena Russian | 990 | 1414 |
| LMArena French | — | 1423 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1416 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1454 |

## Instruction Following

- Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 50.1 (#294)
- GLM-4.5: 74.3 (#100)

| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | GLM-4.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 992 | 1405 |

## Long Context

- Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 30.5 (#281)
- GLM-4.5: 38.2 (#196)

| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | GLM-4.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1003 | 1413 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | — | 58.3% |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 25.3 (#301)
- GLM-4.5: 57.7 (#121)

| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | GLM-4.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1022 | 1430 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 998 | 1395 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 958 | 1415 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | — | 73.4% |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 1343 |

## FAQ

### Is Gemma 1.1 2b IT better than GLM-4.5?

GLM-4.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.4 to 28.8 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Gemma 1.1 2b IT or GLM-4.5 better for coding?

GLM-4.5 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 41.1 versus 29.6 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Gemma 1.1 2b IT and GLM-4.5 share?

14 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 1.1 2b IT has 16 scored results on Noometry and GLM-4.5 has 27.