# Gemini Advanced 0514 vs Qwen3.8 27B

> Qwen3.8 27B is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.3 to 37.1 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemini-advanced-vs-qwen3-8-27b
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 17

## Summary

- They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini Advanced 0514 scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen3.8 27B in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Qwen3.8 27B leads 65.9 to 48.8.
- Qwen3.8 27B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Gemini Advanced 0514 | Qwen3.8 27B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 37.1 | 45.3 |
| Rank | 195 | 64 |
| Context | — | 262K |
| Input $/M | — | $0.99 |
| Output $/M | — | $1.49 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- Gemini Advanced 0514: 36.0 (#202)
- Qwen3.8 27B: 50.3 (#42)

| Benchmark | Gemini Advanced 0514 | Qwen3.8 27B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1255 | 1487 |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1592 |
| SciCode | — | 46.6% |

## Reasoning

- Gemini Advanced 0514: 23.6 (#163)
- Qwen3.8 27B: 31.5 (#71)

| Benchmark | Gemini Advanced 0514 | Qwen3.8 27B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1248 | 1459 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 54.5% |
| CritPt | — | 5.4% |
| DTBench | — | 88% |
| LMCA | — | 41.4% |
| Surface Evolver Bench | — | 45% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 149.38 |

## Math

- Gemini Advanced 0514: 32.9 (#181)
- Qwen3.8 27B: 35.7 (#139)

| Benchmark | Gemini Advanced 0514 | Qwen3.8 27B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1272 | 1453 |
| ProofBench | — | 16% |

## Knowledge

- Gemini Advanced 0514: 32.7 (#201)
- Qwen3.8 27B: 40.9 (#105)

| Benchmark | Gemini Advanced 0514 | Qwen3.8 27B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1215 | 1482 |

## Multimodal

- Gemini Advanced 0514: —
- Qwen3.8 27B: 40.5 (#36)

| Benchmark | Gemini Advanced 0514 | Qwen3.8 27B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1270 |

## Multilingual

- Gemini Advanced 0514: 42.8 (#187)
- Qwen3.8 27B: 54.0 (#54)

| Benchmark | Gemini Advanced 0514 | Qwen3.8 27B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1274 | 1431 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1274 | 1504 |
| LMArena French | 1306 | 1468 |
| LMArena German | 1275 | 1435 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1242 | 1392 |
| LMArena Korean | 1232 | 1389 |
| LMArena Russian | 1283 | 1421 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1242 | 1444 |

## Instruction Following

- Gemini Advanced 0514: 66.2 (#206)
- Qwen3.8 27B: 75.8 (#54)

| Benchmark | Gemini Advanced 0514 | Qwen3.8 27B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1254 | 1436 |

## Long Context

- Gemini Advanced 0514: 38.0 (#202)
- Qwen3.8 27B: 44.3 (#66)

| Benchmark | Gemini Advanced 0514 | Qwen3.8 27B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1254 | 1448 |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemini Advanced 0514: 48.8 (#195)
- Qwen3.8 27B: 65.9 (#41)

| Benchmark | Gemini Advanced 0514 | Qwen3.8 27B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1279 | 1441 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1284 | 1382 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1269 | 1443 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 1671 |

## FAQ

### Is Gemini Advanced 0514 better than Qwen3.8 27B?

Qwen3.8 27B is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.3 to 37.1 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Gemini Advanced 0514 or Qwen3.8 27B better for coding?

Qwen3.8 27B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 50.3 versus 36.0 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Gemini Advanced 0514 and Qwen3.8 27B share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini Advanced 0514 has 17 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.8 27B has 28.