# Gemini Advanced 0514 vs Qwen2.5-Coder-32B

> Gemini Advanced 0514 is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.7 to 33.4 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemini-advanced-vs-qwen2-5-coder-32b
- Last updated: 2026-10-11
- Shared benchmarks: 12

## Summary

- They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini Advanced 0514 scores higher in 7 categories and Qwen2.5-Coder-32B in 1 category; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in coding, where Gemini Advanced 0514 leads 36.6 to 22.6.
- Qwen2.5-Coder-32B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Gemini Advanced 0514 | Qwen2.5-Coder-32B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 37.7 | 33.4 |
| Rank | 197 | 245 |
| Context | — | 33K |
| Input $/M | — | $0.66 |
| Output $/M | — | $1 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- Gemini Advanced 0514: 36.6 (#205)
- Qwen2.5-Coder-32B: 22.6 (#333)

| Benchmark | Gemini Advanced 0514 | Qwen2.5-Coder-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1255 | 1276 |
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | — | 9% |
| Aider Polyglot | — | 16.4% |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 49% |
| LiveBench Coding | — | 56.9% |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 58% |
| HumanEval+ | — | 87.2% |
| MBPP+ | — | 77% |

## Reasoning

- Gemini Advanced 0514: 24.6 (#160)
- Qwen2.5-Coder-32B: 21.2 (#225)

| Benchmark | Gemini Advanced 0514 | Qwen2.5-Coder-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1248 | 1251 |
| LiveBench Reasoning | — | 42.1% |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | — | 49.9% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 119.49 |
| HellaSwag | — | 83% |
| LiveBench | — | 46.2% |
| WinoGrande | — | 80.8% |

## Math

- Gemini Advanced 0514: 35.5 (#181)
- Qwen2.5-Coder-32B: 33.3 (#204)

| Benchmark | Gemini Advanced 0514 | Qwen2.5-Coder-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1272 | 1251 |
| LiveBench Math | — | 46.6% |
| GSM8K | — | 93% |

## Knowledge

- Gemini Advanced 0514: 33.3 (#205)
- Qwen2.5-Coder-32B: 33.4 (#203)

| Benchmark | Gemini Advanced 0514 | Qwen2.5-Coder-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1215 | 1221 |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | — | 70.5% |
| MMLU | — | 79.1% |

## Multilingual

- Gemini Advanced 0514: 42.6 (#192)
- Qwen2.5-Coder-32B: 37.8 (#235)

| Benchmark | Gemini Advanced 0514 | Qwen2.5-Coder-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1274 | 1205 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1274 | 1222 |
| LMArena Russian | 1283 | 1228 |
| LMArena French | 1307 | — |
| LMArena German | 1275 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1242 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1232 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1242 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Gemini Advanced 0514: 66.0 (#212)
- Qwen2.5-Coder-32B: 61.4 (#245)

| Benchmark | Gemini Advanced 0514 | Qwen2.5-Coder-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1253 | 1223 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | — | 58.7% |

## Long Context

- Gemini Advanced 0514: 38.0 (#207)
- Qwen2.5-Coder-32B: 38.0 (#208)

| Benchmark | Gemini Advanced 0514 | Qwen2.5-Coder-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1253 | 1251 |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemini Advanced 0514: 48.5 (#200)
- Qwen2.5-Coder-32B: 41.6 (#240)

| Benchmark | Gemini Advanced 0514 | Qwen2.5-Coder-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1279 | 1230 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1284 | 1174 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1269 | 1222 |
| LiveBench Language | — | 23.3% |

## FAQ

### Is Gemini Advanced 0514 better than Qwen2.5-Coder-32B?

Gemini Advanced 0514 is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.7 to 33.4 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Gemini Advanced 0514 or Qwen2.5-Coder-32B better for coding?

Gemini Advanced 0514 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 36.6 versus 22.6 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Gemini Advanced 0514 and Qwen2.5-Coder-32B share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini Advanced 0514 has 17 scored results on Noometry and Qwen2.5-Coder-32B has 31.