# Gemini Advanced 0514 vs Qwen1.5-72B

> Gemini Advanced 0514 is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.1 to 30.3 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemini-advanced-vs-qwen1-5-72b
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 17

## Summary

- They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini Advanced 0514 scores higher in 8 categories and Qwen1.5-72B in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Gemini Advanced 0514 leads 32.7 to 11.5.
- Qwen1.5-72B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Gemini Advanced 0514 | Qwen1.5-72B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 37.1 | 30.3 |
| Rank | 195 | 282 |
| Context | — | — |
| Input $/M | — | — |
| Output $/M | — | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- Gemini Advanced 0514: 36.0 (#202)
- Qwen1.5-72B: 31.4 (#272)

| Benchmark | Gemini Advanced 0514 | Qwen1.5-72B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1255 | 1166 |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 33.2% |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 40.3% |
| HumanEval+ | — | 59.1% |
| MBPP+ | — | 61.6% |

## Reasoning

- Gemini Advanced 0514: 23.6 (#163)
- Qwen1.5-72B: 21.2 (#201)

| Benchmark | Gemini Advanced 0514 | Qwen1.5-72B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1248 | 1148 |

## Math

- Gemini Advanced 0514: 32.9 (#181)
- Qwen1.5-72B: 30.7 (#205)

| Benchmark | Gemini Advanced 0514 | Qwen1.5-72B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1272 | 1164 |

## Knowledge

- Gemini Advanced 0514: 32.7 (#201)
- Qwen1.5-72B: 11.5 (#295)

| Benchmark | Gemini Advanced 0514 | Qwen1.5-72B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1215 | 1136 |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 28.8% |

## Multilingual

- Gemini Advanced 0514: 42.8 (#187)
- Qwen1.5-72B: 33.4 (#248)

| Benchmark | Gemini Advanced 0514 | Qwen1.5-72B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1274 | 1135 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1274 | 1186 |
| LMArena French | 1306 | 1158 |
| LMArena German | 1275 | 1084 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1242 | 1061 |
| LMArena Korean | 1232 | 1049 |
| LMArena Russian | 1283 | 1104 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1242 | 1110 |

## Instruction Following

- Gemini Advanced 0514: 66.2 (#206)
- Qwen1.5-72B: 59.6 (#251)

| Benchmark | Gemini Advanced 0514 | Qwen1.5-72B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1254 | 1142 |

## Long Context

- Gemini Advanced 0514: 38.0 (#202)
- Qwen1.5-72B: 35.0 (#238)

| Benchmark | Gemini Advanced 0514 | Qwen1.5-72B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1254 | 1157 |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemini Advanced 0514: 48.8 (#195)
- Qwen1.5-72B: 37.4 (#253)

| Benchmark | Gemini Advanced 0514 | Qwen1.5-72B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1279 | 1166 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1284 | 1137 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1269 | 1160 |

## FAQ

### Is Gemini Advanced 0514 better than Qwen1.5-72B?

Gemini Advanced 0514 is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.1 to 30.3 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Gemini Advanced 0514 or Qwen1.5-72B better for coding?

Gemini Advanced 0514 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 36.0 versus 31.4 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Gemini Advanced 0514 and Qwen1.5-72B share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini Advanced 0514 has 17 scored results on Noometry and Qwen1.5-72B has 22.