# Gemini Advanced 0514 vs Olmo 3.1 32b Think

> Gemini Advanced 0514 and Olmo 3.1 32b Think score almost the same on the Noometry Index (37.1 vs 37.3), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemini-advanced-vs-olmo-3-1-32b-think
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 15

## Summary

- They share 15 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini Advanced 0514 scores higher in 3 categories and Olmo 3.1 32b Think in 5 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in multilingual, where Gemini Advanced 0514 leads 42.8 to 38.3.
- Olmo 3.1 32b Think has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Gemini Advanced 0514 | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) |
| Noometry Index | 37.1 | 37.3 |
| Rank | 195 | 191 |
| Context | — | — |
| Input $/M | — | — |
| Output $/M | — | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- Gemini Advanced 0514: 36.0 (#202)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 37.1 (#186)

| Benchmark | Gemini Advanced 0514 | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1255 | 1292 |

## Reasoning

- Gemini Advanced 0514: 23.6 (#163)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 24.1 (#151)

| Benchmark | Gemini Advanced 0514 | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1248 | 1272 |

## Math

- Gemini Advanced 0514: 32.9 (#181)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 33.6 (#170)

| Benchmark | Gemini Advanced 0514 | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1272 | 1305 |

## Knowledge

- Gemini Advanced 0514: 32.7 (#201)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 35.0 (#178)

| Benchmark | Gemini Advanced 0514 | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1215 | 1294 |

## Multilingual

- Gemini Advanced 0514: 42.8 (#187)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 38.3 (#226)

| Benchmark | Gemini Advanced 0514 | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1274 | 1210 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1274 | 1241 |
| LMArena French | 1306 | 1262 |
| LMArena German | 1275 | 1260 |
| LMArena Russian | 1283 | 1193 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1242 | 1288 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1242 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1232 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Gemini Advanced 0514: 66.2 (#206)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 65.8 (#213)

| Benchmark | Gemini Advanced 0514 | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1254 | 1246 |

## Long Context

- Gemini Advanced 0514: 38.0 (#202)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 38.6 (#190)

| Benchmark | Gemini Advanced 0514 | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1254 | 1272 |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemini Advanced 0514: 48.8 (#195)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 46.4 (#215)

| Benchmark | Gemini Advanced 0514 | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1279 | 1271 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1284 | 1226 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1269 | 1252 |

## FAQ

### Is Gemini Advanced 0514 better than Olmo 3.1 32b Think?

Gemini Advanced 0514 and Olmo 3.1 32b Think score almost the same on the Noometry Index (37.1 vs 37.3), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

### Is Gemini Advanced 0514 or Olmo 3.1 32b Think better for coding?

Olmo 3.1 32b Think scores higher on coding benchmarks: 37.1 versus 36.0 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Gemini Advanced 0514 and Olmo 3.1 32b Think share?

15 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini Advanced 0514 has 17 scored results on Noometry and Olmo 3.1 32b Think has 15.